RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF ELT COURSEBOOK EFFECTIVENESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.81589Keywords:
ELT coursebook, retrospective empirical evaluation, coursebook effectiveness, evaluation criteria, online forms.Abstract
The right choice of a coursebook makes both teaching and learning experiences effective and enjoyable. However, the real strengths and weaknesses of the chosen teaching material become apparent only over a period of continuous use. This article looks into the way coursebook effectiveness can be evaluated by the participants of the educational process. The importance of retrospective assessment of a coursebook is emphasised, considering the fact that it enables to evaluate the work done and make the appropriate decisions for the future courses. The evaluation should be performed not only by teachers, but also by students. For this purpose, two different assessment forms have been developed. The author stresses that learners and educators view coursebooks from the various standpoints, that’s why their evaluation forms should include different sets of parameters. The principles for creating the questionnaires for teachers and students are outlined in the present work. The article suggests that the most effective way to conduct a coursebook evaluation is to use free data mining web tools which not only streamline the evaluation process, but also enable to effectively process the results of the survey. The author outlines the process of creating interactive questionnaires using one of such web tools. The last part of the article features description of the practical implementation of the suggested evaluation approach. The developed questionnaires have been used to evaluate Speakout Intermediate coursebook with which a general course of English was taught to a group of adult learners. The results of the survey and possible implications thereof are discussed in the article.
Downloads
References
- Burynska, N. M. (2003). Personality-oriented tuition as a key didactic function of a modern coursebook. Problemy suchasnogo pidruchnyka, 4, 7-10.
- Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook . Oxford, England: Heinemann.
- Ellis, R. (1997). The Empirical Evaluation of Language Teaching Materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36
| - Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching . Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.
- Kodliuk, Y. (2003). Analysis and evaluation of school coursebooks. Pidruchnyk XXI stolittya: naukovo-pedagogichnyi zhurnal, 1-4, 72-79.
- Miekley, J. (2005). ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The Reading Matrix, 5 (2). Retrieved from: http://www.readingmatrix.com/reading_projects/miekley/project.pdf
- Mukundan, J. & Ahour, T. (2010). 21 A Review of Textbook Evaluation Checklists across Four Decades (1970–2008). In Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 336-352). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474211949.ch-021
- Prokopenko, A. I. (2003). Informatsiina tekhnologia leksychnoi kvalimetrii dydaktychnykh zasobiv (na prykladi pidruchnykiv angliiskoi movy) [Information technology of lexical quality measurement of didactive materials – evidence from the coursebooks of the English language ]. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Kyiv, Ukraine: In-t. pedahohiky i psykholohiyi prof. osvity APN Ukrayiny.
- Rubdy, R. (2003). Selection of materials. In Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 37-57). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474211826.ch-002
- Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 2, 432-453.
- Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers' perspectives. Educational Research and Reviews, 5 (9), 508.
| - Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2014). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474211826
- Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zhuk, J. O. (2009). Evaluation of the quality of school coursebooks. Problemy suchasnogo pidruchnyka, 9, 7-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Marianna Lisna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).