AMBIVALENCE OF INTEGRATED MYSELF – DESINTEGRATED MYSELF IN ADOLESCENCE

Authors

  • T. M. Zelins’ka National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.39392

Keywords:

ambivalence, integrated myself, desintegrated myself, adolescence

Abstract

A systemic formative psychological phenomenon (integrated myself – desintegrated myself) is a semantic integrity and «a system of systems» in the structure of the genesis of personal ambivalence in adolescence. Integrated myself and desintegrated myself are linked to each component of ambivalence as a whole with one of several of its major units. The need in life as the root cause of personality development (S. D. Maksimenko) has a stable branch in the ambivalence of integrated myself and desintegrated myself in adolescence.

Integrated myself has a moderate resistance to a different expression of oneself, characterized by balance, coherence and harmony experiences in adolescence. Desintegrated myself is characterized by an intense expression of resistance and struggle for dominance of different aspects of oneself and suppression of others which is accompanied by imbalances, inconsistencies and disharmony of experience at this age.

It has been shown that the expressions of ambivalence of integrated myself – desintegrated myself in those adolescents are found in three levels: low harmonic, average inconsistent and high disharmonious. It has been found that there is a gradual increase in low harmonic level in persons from 17 to 20 years old. In addition, it has been found that there is a positive gradual reduction of average inconsistent and high disharmonious levels among people of 17 to 20 years old. The study has found that there is an increase of imbalance, incoherence, disharmony in ambivalence of integrated myself – desintegrated myself and wish to change during the transition to early adulthood among persons of 21 years old.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Zelins’ka, T.M. (2013) Psychology of personal ambivalence in adolescence. Sumy, Ukraine: Universytetska knyha [in Ukrainian].
  2. Krymskii, S.B. (2000). Philosophy as a way of hope and humanity. Kyiv, Ukraine: Kurs [in Russian].
  3. Mae R. (2001). The power and innocence. Moscow, Russia: Smysl [in Russian].
  4. Papucha, M.V. (2011). Inner world and its formation: monograph. Nizhin, Ukraine: Publisher Lysenko M. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Rogers,.K (1998). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. Moscow, Russia: Progres [in Russian].
  6. Sokolova, E. T. (2001). On the justification of the clinical and psychological study of gender identity disorder. Voprosy Psikhologii, 6, 3-16 [in Russian].
  7. Taylor, S, People, L, Sears, D. (2004). Social psychology. St. Petersburg, Russia: Peter [in Russian].
  8. Stolin, V.V. (1983). Consciousness of the person. Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of Moscow University [in Russian].
  9. Wilber, K. Integral psychology: consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Moscow, Russia: OOO “Publ ACT” [in Russian].

Downloads

How to Cite

Zelins’ka, T. M. (2014). AMBIVALENCE OF INTEGRATED MYSELF – DESINTEGRATED MYSELF IN ADOLESCENCE. Advanced Education, 1(2), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.39392

Issue

2014: Issue 2

Section

Educational Psychology

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Advanced Education

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).