ENHANCING MANUSCRIPT QUALITY: COMMON MISTAKES AND BEST PRACTICES FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PAPERS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.309550

Keywords:

academic publishing, educational research journals, manuscript submission, peer review, research methodology, publication strategies

Abstract

This editorial offers a comprehensive guide for researchers planning to publish in high-impact education journals. It identifies common pitfalls in manuscript submissions and provides practical recommendations to overcome them. The paper emphasizes the importance of aligning with a journal's aims and scope, adhering to submission guidelines, and effectively structuring the manuscript using the IMRAD model. It also addresses weaknesses in various manuscript sections and underlines the significance of citing up-to-date sources, detailed methodological descriptions, ethical considerations, and a logical flow between sections. It concludes that respectful communication in response letters to reviewers significantly impacts the publication decision. Additionally, it offers valuable strategies to improve publication success in high-impact education journals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zoia Kornieva, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Dean of the Faculty of Linguistics, Editor-in-Chief of the journal Advanced Education, Doctor of Science (Pedagogics), Full Professor, Department of Theory, Practice and Translation of the English Language

Valentyna Lukianenko, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

Ph.D, Associate Professor, The Department of English for Engineering #2

Yuliia Baklazhenko, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD (Pedagogics), Associate Professor, Department of Theory, Practice and Translation of the English Language

References

  1. Abed, M. (2015). A consideration to two main ethical issues in educational research, and how these may be addressed. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.26634/JPSY.8.3.3099
  2. Arianto, M. A., Saukah, A., Basthomi, Y., & Wulyani, A. N. (2021). Previous studies have several limitations …: Indonesian doctoral students’, Indonesian academics’, and international authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article abstracts and introductions. Journal of Language & Education, 7(2), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11735
  3. Arsyad, S., & Zainil, Y. (2023). Research gap strategies in article introductions of different rank applied linguistics journals. Studies in English Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25302
  4. Au, W. (2017). Highlights for Improvement of Scientific Writing for Publication in High Impact Journals. The Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 3, 97 - 98. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccm-2017-0022
    |
  5. Busse, C., & August, E. (2020). How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal. Journal of Cancer Education, 36(5), 909–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01751-z
    |
  6. Hunt, M., Ochmańska, M., & Cilulko-Dołęga, J. (2019). How to write an effective response letter to reviewers. Medical Science Pulse. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.1448
  7. Lodge, J., Corrin, L., Huijser, H., & Han, F. (2024). A step-by-step guide on how NOT to get published in a high impact educational technology journal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9492

Downloads

Published

2024-08-14

How to Cite

Kornieva, Z., Lukianenko, V., & Baklazhenko, Y. (2024). ENHANCING MANUSCRIPT QUALITY: COMMON MISTAKES AND BEST PRACTICES FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PAPERS. Advanced Education, 12(24), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.309550

Issue

Section

Editorial