INTENTIONAL VS INCIDENTAL ESP VOCABULARY ACQUISITION BY POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.200729

Keywords:

ESP, political science, intentional vs incidental vocabulary uptake, involvement load, audiovisual input, vocabulary acquisition

Abstract

The article discusses an experiment that researched the intentional vs incidental ESP vocabulary uptake in two university groups of third year political science students and addresses the implications of using an authentic audiovisual material as an input text for an ESP course. The procedure of intentional vocabulary learning involved pre-teaching of lexical items and explicitly informing the students they would have to use the vocabulary in a following productive activity (writing an essay), while the incidental uptake took place in the course of self-study where the students had to watch an authentic audiovisual recording and then write an essay on the subject discussed in the video. The case study employed a quantitative research method to calculate the amount of the target words and collocations used in the written output, and a qualitative method to assess the accuracy of their usage. Two months later a delayed posttest was done to check the students’ productive knowledge of the target lexis form. The experiment correlated with output- and involvement load hypotheses, and had to assess the effect of a text-based output on learning outcomes, as well as observe how applicable is the involvement load hypothesis to analysing the students’ self-study strategies. The study showed that the intentional mode of learning outperformed the incidental acquisition by over 20% and suggested what factors may have enhanced the scope of the ESP vocabulary retention. Further studies could concentrate on evaluating ESP learners’ both productive and receptive target vocabulary competence over a longer-term perspective. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Svetlana Danilina, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD in Translation Studies, Department of Foreign Languages for History and Philosophy Faculties, Institute of Philology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

 

Viktoriia Shabunina, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD in Law, Department of Foreign Languages for History and Philosophy Faculties, Institute of Philology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

References

  1. Blagojevic, S. (2013). Original Texts as Authentic ESP Teaching Material – the Case of Philosophy. ESP Today, 1 (1), 113-126. Retrieved April, 12, 2020, from https://www.esptodayjournal.org/pdf/vol_1_1/7.%20SAVKA%20BLAGOJEVIC-%20full%20text.pdf
    |
  2. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–110 (2012). https://doi. org/10.1017/S0267190512000050
    |
  4. Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2002). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  6. Garnier, M., & Schmitt, M. (2016). Picking Up polysemous phrasal verbs: How many do learners know and what facilitates this knowledge? SYSTEM, 59, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.004
    |
  7. Krashen, S. (2009). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition (1st Internet Edition).
  8. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ applin/22.1.1
    | |
  9. Lee, S., & Pulido, D. (2017). The impact of topic interest, L2 proficiency, and gender on EFL incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research, 21, 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816637381
    | |
  10. Lewis, M. (1999). The lexical approach: state of ELT and a way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
  11. Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
  12. Nguyen, C. D., & Boers, F. (2018). The Effect of Content Retelling on Vocabulary Uptake from a TED Talk. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 1-25. http://dx. doi/abs/10.1002/tesq.441
    | |
  13. Pauwels, P. (2018). How advanced students approach intentional vocabulary study. The Language Learning Journal, 46 (3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1078398
    | |
  14. Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21 (3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815618428
    | |
  15. Peters, E. (2014). The effects of repetition and time of post-test administration on EFL learners’ form recall of single words and collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18 (1), 75–94. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505384
    | |
  16. Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20 (1), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814568131
    | |
  17. Ponniah, R. J. (2011). Incidental acquisition of vocabulary by reading. The Reading Matrix, 11 (2), 135-139. Retrieved April, 12, 2020, from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/april_2011/ponniah.pdf
  18. Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of Van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation, (2006), and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444815000075
    | |
  19. Snoder, P. (2017). Improving English Learners’ Productive Collocation Knowledge: The Effects of Involvement Load, Spacing, and Intentionality. TESL Canada Journal, 34 (3), 140-164. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1277
    |
  20. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. Principles and practices in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
  21. Thornbury, S. (2006). An A-Z of ELT (1st ed). Macmillan Publishers Limited.
  22. van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: a dimensions approach. SYSTEM, 41, 609-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.012
  23. Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20 (2), 232-245. Retrieved 12 April 2020 from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2008/webb/webb.pdf
  24. Xu, X. (2010). An empirical study on the effect of task on L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Asian Social Science, 6 (7), 126-131. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n7p126
  25. Zubenko, T., & Shwedel, A. (2019). Integrating mobile listening and physical activity to facilitate intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Advanced Education, 11, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.165717

Downloads

Published

2020-12-16

How to Cite

Danilina, S., & Shabunina, V. (2020). INTENTIONAL VS INCIDENTAL ESP VOCABULARY ACQUISITION BY POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENTS. Advanced Education, 7(16), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.200729

Issue

2020: Issue 16

Section

ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Svetlana Danilina, Viktoriia Shabunina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).