THE VOUCHER PROGRAMME AS A CHALLENGE FOR SOCIAL WORK TEACHING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.110945

Keywords:

adult learning, peer groups, social work, vouchers system

Abstract

The study presents the experiences of introducing the so-called educational voucher system for adults over 45 years old in Ukraine. Based on the content analysis of academic documents, the survey of adult students and interviews with educators, the study examines motivation, learning process and self-evaluation of the social work training among students who already have a higher education. The research findings demonstrate that the students over 45 years old were motivated to get an additional university degree in social work mainly because of a need for self-realisation, and not because of market demands. In the survey, 20 out of 25 respondents claimed that they had an idea of what social work was as a profession prior to beginning their studies and hardly are going to work within the new profession. Adult students highly prize positive in-class atmosphere and prefer to study in a group of peers; they more or less easily adjust to the new learning environment. At the same time, teaching had to challenge the expectations of adult learners with learning arrangements that are non-traditional for them. The research adds another layer to the professional debate on the social work education model by focusing on 45+ students, competences and ethical behaviour mastering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tetyana Semigina, Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism

Professor, Department of Social Work and Applied Psycology;

Dr. in Political Sciences, Master in Social Work

Oksana Pozhidayeva, Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism

Associate Professor, Department of Social Work and Applied Psycology;

PhD in Pedagogy 

References

  1. An, S. (2014). Social work between “Westernization” and “nationalization”: The transnational perspective on social work in post-socialist/post-Soviet states. In C. Bahr, H. G., Homfeld, C. Schröder, W. Schroer, & C. Schweppe (Eds.), The World Atlas of Social Work. Weinheim/Munchen: BELTZ Juventa.
  2. Brabandere, de L. & Iny, A. (2012). Thinking in New Boxes: A New Paradigm for Business Creativity. US: Random House.
  3. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2013). On approval of the issuance of vouchers for maintaining the competitiveness of individuals in the labor market: Order. Retrieved March 15, 2017, from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/207-2013-%D0%BF
  4. Cummings, S. M., Chaffin, K. M. & Cockerham, C. (2015). Comparative Analysis of an Online and a Traditional MSW Program: Educational Outcomes. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(1), 109-120, https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.977170
    |
  5. Croisdale-Appleby, D. (2014). Re-visioning Social Work Education. An independent review. Retrieved March 10, 2017 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/social-work-education-review
  6. Dominelli, L. (2010). Social Work in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  7. Horvat, A., Dobrota, M., Krsmanovic, M., & Cudanov, M. (2015). Student perception of Moodle learning management system: a satisfaction and significance analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788033
    |
  8. Iilyoshi, T., Kumar, V. M. S. (Eds.) (2016). Opening Up Education. The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01135_1_2.x
    |
  9. Jones, D. & Truell, R. (2012). The Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: A place to link together and be effective in a globalized world. International Social Work, 55 (4), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812440587
  10. Kenner, C., & Weinerman, J. (2011). Adult learning theory: Applications to non-traditional college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2011.10850344
    |
  11. Knight, J.K. & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4, 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082
    | |
  12. Lyons, K. & Huegler, N. (2012). European Perspectives on Education for Social Work and Social Pedagogy. Social Work Education and Training, Research Highlights in Social Work, 54, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017314542321
  13. McAllister, C. (2013). A Process Evaluation of an Online BSW Program: Getting the Student Perspective. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4-5), 514-530, https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.838200
    |
  14. Murray, C. (2011). Use of learning styles to enhance graduate education. Journal of Allied Health, 40, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2012.763199
    |
  15. Novik, N. (2012). Issues facing Social Work Education in the Canadian Arctic. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1. Retrieved May, 30, 2017, from http://journal.uia.no/index.php/JCSW/article/viewFile/239/174
  16. Osteen, P. J. (2011). Motivations, values, and conflict resolution: Students’ integration of personal and professional identities. Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 423–444. https://doi.org/10.5175/jswe.2011.200900131
    |
  17. Ramon, S., ed. (2000). Creating social work and social policy education in Kiev, Ukraine: An experiment in social innovation. Cambridge: Anglia Polytechnic University.
  18. Seiler, D. (2011). Age and learning style in the adult learner. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 7, 133–138. Retrieved May, 30, 2017, from http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/15%20David%20Seiler.pdf .
  19. Semigina, T., Kabachenko, N. & Boyko, O. (2017). Piloting a social work doctoral programme: Ukraine’s vignette. European Social Work Journal, 20(2), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1202203
  20. Sewpaul, V. & Jones, D. (2004). Global standards for social work education and training. Social Work Education, 23 (5), 493–514, https://doi.org/10.1080/0261547042000252244.
  21. Skills for Care (2014). Critically reflective action learning: improving social work practice though critically reflective learning. Leeds. Retrieved May, 29, 2017, from http://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/Learning-development/Learning-and-development.aspx
  22. State Statistical Service of Ukraine (2013). Zarobitna plata za profesiynymy hrupamy u 2012 rotsi (za materialamy vybirkovoho obstezhennya) [Wages and salaries by professional groups in 2012 (based on sample surveys)]. Kyiv: Derzhstat Ukrayiny.
  23. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012).The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
  24. Tkachenko, L.G. (2015). Vauchery na navchannya osib vikom starshe 45 rokiv yak instrument aktyvnoyi polityky rynku pratsi [Vouchers for training persons aged over 45 years as a tool for active labor market policies]. Demohrafiya ta sotsialʹna ekonomika, 2 (24), 41-50.
  25. Tsang, N. M. (2011). Ethos of the day—challenges and opportunities in twenty-first century social work education. Social Work Education, 30, 367–380, https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.501860
  26. Yurovska, V.V., Yatskevych, D. S. (2016). Vaucherna prohrama yak skladova reformy natsionalʹnoyi polityky na rynku pratsi [Voucher programme as a component of the reform of national policy in the labor market]. Derzhava ta rehiony, 1 (51), 26-32.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-16

How to Cite

Semigina, T., & Pozhidayeva, O. (2018). THE VOUCHER PROGRAMME AS A CHALLENGE FOR SOCIAL WORK TEACHING. Advanced Education, 5, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.110945

Issue

2018: Issue 9

Section

Education

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Tetyana Semigina, Oksana Pozhidayeva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).