METHODS THAT WORK: BEST PRACTICES OF ADULT EDUCATORS IN THE USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.109216Keywords:
adult, adult educators, method, best practices, traditional teaching, reflective approach, barriers to learningAbstract
The article discusses best practices of American adult educators. The basic terms related to the topic, which are used in academic literature, are defined. Considering the range of terms synonymous to “adult educator” (teacher, instructor, trainer, practitioner, facilitator, mentor, educator, resource person, programme advisor, etc.), the roles adult educators play are described. The article concentrates on identifying the most important barriers to learning of adults (situational, dispositional, institutional, environmental, emotional) understanding of which is necessary for adult educators. Previous experience of adults is described as one of possible reasons for resistance to learning. The paper also reveals methods which adult educators use to overcome the barriers and facilitate adult learners in reaching their educational goals, the importance of flexibility for adult educators, providing choices for adults and ways of getting feedback. The eclectic approach to teaching adults, which may combine learner-centred teaching, content-centred teaching, reflective teaching, cooperative learning, experiential learning, and even traditional teaching, is found to be most appropriate. Thus, the article suggests considering the needs of adults, not adherence to a certain theory or approach, to be of utmost importance for adult educators. Best practices of American adult educators include: theory followed by practice, equal participation, team work, availability of choices, different types of assessment and reflection, which ensure practice, variety and enforcement.
Downloads
References
- Anthony, E. M. (1963). Approach, Method, and Technique. ELT Journal XVII (2), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/xvii.2.63
- Bries, T. (2013). Teaching Tip: Five Easy Kinesthetic Activities for Adults. ITBE Link: A Quarterly Newsletter – Fall 2013. Retrieved 15 September, 2017 from http://www.itbe.org/v_newsletters/article_11881185.htm
- Brooks-Lewis, K. A. (2012). Stereotyping in foreign language education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 523-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.200
- Brown, H. (1994). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. New Jersey: Prentice hall Regents.
- Chugai, O. (2016). Profesijna pidhotovka pedahohichnoho personalu dlya systemy osvity doroslyx USA [Professional training of pedagogical staff for the adult education system in the United States]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyiv, Ukraine.
- Claremont Graduate University TEA Program 2012 Handbook (2012). Claremont: CGU.
- Dinkel, A. M. (2011). Training the Kinesthetic learner. ALN Magazine. Retrieved 17 September, 2017 from https://www.alnmag.com/article/2011/06/training-kinesthetic-learner
- Houle, C. O. (1996). The design of education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Hughes, J. & McLarty, R. (2016). ETpedia Business English: 500 ideas for Business English teachers. London: Pavilion Publishing and Media Ltd.
- Knowles, M. S. (1990). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species (4th ed.) Houston, London, Paris, Zurich, Tokyo: Gulf Publishing.
- Lieb, S. (1991). Principles of Adult Learning. Retrieved 11 September, 2017 from http://www.life-slc.org/learningprinciples/Principles_of_Adult_Learning.pdf
- Merriam, S. B. (2007). The Profession and Practice of Adult Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713608322827
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2017). Retrieved 14 September, 2017 from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/best%20practice
- Mertesdorf, J. C. (1990). Learning styles and barriers to learning perceived by adult students on campus. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 11207. Retrieved 15 September, 2017 from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/11207.
- Ogienko, O. (2016). Facilitation in the context of pedagogical activities. Advanced Education, 5, 85 – 89. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.70621
- Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston, Mass.: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
- Post, H. W. (2010.) Teaching Adults: What Every Trainer Needs to Know About Adult Learning Styles. Retrieved 14 September, 2017 from PACER Center http://www.fastfamilysupport.org/fasttraining/Other/teachingadults-whattrainersneedtoknow.pdf
- Reed, A.J.S. (1998). A Guide to Observation and Participation In the Classroom. Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill.
- Richards, J. C. (1996). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667169.003
- Russell, Sally S. (2006). An Overview of Adult Learning Processes. UROLOGIC Nursing: Continuing Education, 26 (5), 349-370. Retrieved 15 September, 2017 from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/547417_4
| - Tarone, E. & Yule, G. (1989). Focus on the language learner: Approaches to identifying and meeting the needs of second language learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Oksana Chugai, Olena Terenko, Olena Ogienko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).