INVESTIGATING HIGHER EDUCATION COURSE LEADERSHIP PRACTICE – AN ARGUMENT FOR USING GROUNDED THEORY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.288558

Keywords:

Grounded Theory, Higher Education, Course Leadership, Staff Development, Methodology

Abstract

The study of course leadership in higher education focusses on an understudied area of research, with a limited number of publications discussing the role of the course leader in higher education, and a distinct lack of research on how course leaders in higher education undertake their professional practice. This lack of a pre-existing theory points the researcher towards grounded theory to investigate and generate a new theory on course leaders’ experiences. Since leadership, and therefore course leadership, is an inherent complex social process, selection of grounded theory as a research methodology to explain how course leaders in higher education practice seems a logical choice. Grounded theory has been successfully used to investigate phenomena in education and in leadership practice in other disciplines. We therefore argue that grounded theory is an appropriate selection for research in education and higher education settings for areas of research where no theory currently exists. Moreover, grounded theories focussing on professional practice have been published in various contexts demonstrating that it is an appropriate method for investigating course leaders’ professional practice. Finally, this paper outlines some perceived weaknesses of using a grounded theory approach for researching course leadership, and offers means to navigate these.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nieky van Veggel, Writtle University College and Anglia Ruskin University

Senior Lecturer, Department of Animal Science

Associate Lecturer, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care

Hilary Engward, Anglia Ruskin University

Associate Professor, Veterans and Families Insitute for Military Social Research

Philip Howlett, Anglia Ruskin University

Associate Professor, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2007). Implementation of Evidence-based Practice in Child Welfare: Service Provider Perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(4), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0121-3
    |
  2. Ahmed, S., & Haag, M. (2016). Entering the Field: Decisions of an Early Career Researcher. The Grounded Theory Review, 15(2), 76–92.
  3. Barrett-Rodger, L., Goldspink, S., & Engward, H. (2022). Being in the wood: Using a presuppositional interview in hermeneutic phenomenological research. Qualitative Research, 14687941211061055. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211061055
  4. Beck, C. T. (1993). Qualitative Research: The Evaluation of Its Credibility, Fittingness, and Auditability. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15(2), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599301500212
    |
  5. Bhandari, M., Montori, V., Devereaux, P. J., Dosanjh, S., Sprague, S., & Guyatt, G. H. (2003). Challenges to the Practice of Evidence-Based Medicine during Residents’ Surgical Training: A Qualitative Study Using Grounded Theory. Academic Medicine, 78(11), 1183.
    |
  6. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd edition). Sage Publications.
  7. Bolton, G., & Delderfield, R. (2018). Reflective Practice: Writing and professional development (5th edition). Sage Publications Ltd.
  8. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: An illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802156196
  9. Breckenridge, J. (2013). Doing Classic Grounded Theory: The Data Analysis Process. SAGE Research Methods Cases, 1. https://doi.org/10.4135/978144627305014527673
  10. Brown, S. C., Steven, R. A., Troiano, P. F., & Schneider, M. K. (2002). Exploring complex phenomena: Grounded theory in student affairs research. Journal of College Student Development; Baltimore, 43(2), 173.
    |
  11. Bryant, A. (2002). Re-grounding grounded theory. JITTA : Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application; Hong Kong, 4(1), 25–42.
  12. Bryant, A. (2009). Grounded theory and pragmatism: The curious case of Anselm Strauss. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.3.1358
  13. Chametzky, B. (2016). Coding in Classic Grounded Theory: I’ve Done an Interview; Now What? Sociology Mind, 06(04), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2016.64014
  14. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd edition, pp. 509–536). Sage Publications.
  15. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd edition). Sage.
  16. Chiovitti, R. F., & Piran, N. (2003). Rigour and grounded theory research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(4), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02822.x
    |
  17. Chong, C.-H., & Yeo, K.-J. (2015). An Overview of Grounded Theory Design in Educational Research. Asian Social Science, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n12p258
  18. Cooney, A. (2011). Rigour and grounded theory. Nurse Researcher, 18(4), 17–22.
    |
  19. de Haan, J. (2006). How emergence arises. Ecological Complexity, 3(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
  20. Deady, R. (2011). Reading with Methodological Perspective Bias: A journey into Classic Grounded Theory. Grounded Theory Review, 10(1), 41–57.
  21. Dubouloz, C.-J., Egan, M., Vallerand, J., & Zweck, C. von. (1999). Occupational Therapists’ Perceptions of Evidence-Based Practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(5), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.53.5.445
    |
  22. Engward, H. (2013). Understanding grounded theory. Nursing Standard, 28(7), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2013.10.28.7.37.e7806
    |
  23. Engward, H., & Davis, G. (2015). Being reflexive in qualitative grounded theory: Discussion and application of a model of reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(7), 1530–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12653
    |
  24. Evans, G. L. (2013). A Novice Researcher’s First Walk Through the Maze of Grounded Theory: Rationalization for Classical Grounded Theory. Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 37–55.
  25. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
  26. Gasson, S. (2004). Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In M. E. Whitman & A. B. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 79–102). Idea Group Publishing. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.302.5690&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  27. Giske, T., & Artinian, B. (2007). A personal experience of working with classical grounded theory: From beginner to experienced grounded theorist. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(4), 67–80.
  28. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
  29. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing. Sociology Press.
  30. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press.
  31. Glaser, B. G. (1999). The future of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 836–845.
  32. Glaser, B. G. (2002). Constructivist Grounded Theory? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.825
  33. Glaser, B. G. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. Sociology Press.
  34. Glaser, B. G. (2014). Choosing Grounded Theory. Grounded Theory Review, 13(2), 3–19.
  35. Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling Grounded Theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-5.2.607
  36. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (Reprint edition). Aldine Publishing.
  37. Gordon, J., Cooper, B., & Dumbleton, S. (2009). How do social workers use evidence in practice?
  38. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications.
  39. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed (pp. 191–215). Sage Publications Ltd.
  40. Hall, W. A., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257–272.
    |
  41. Hallberg, L. R.-M. (2006). The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620600858399
  42. Hibbert, P., Callagher, L., Siedlok, F., Windahl, C., & Kim, H. S. (2019). (Engaging or Avoiding) Change Through Reflexive Practices. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617718089
  43. Holton, J. A. (2009). Qualitative tussles in undertaking a grounded theory study. Grounded Theory Review, 8(3), 37–50.
  44. Holton, J. A. (2010). The coding process and its challenges. Grounded Theory Review, 9(1), 21–40.
  45. Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011). Guiding the use of Grounded Theory in Doctoral studies–an example from the Australian film industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 95–114.
  46. Kennedy, T. J. T., & Lingard, L. A. (2006). Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Medical Education, 40(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02378.x
    |
  47. Kenny, M., & Fourie, R. (2014). Tracing the history of grounded theory methodology: From formation to fragmentation. The Qualitative Report, 19(52), 1.
  48. Kenny, M., & Fourie, R. (2015). Contrasting classic, Straussian, and constructivist Grounded Theory: Methodological and philosophical conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270.
  49. Kolb, S. M. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83.
  50. Lakshman, C. (2007). Organizational knowledge leadership: A grounded theory approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710718245
  51. Levers, M.-J. D. (2013). Philosophical paradigms, grounded theory, and perspectives on emergence. Sage Open, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013517243
  52. Malik, G., McKenna, L., & Griffiths, D. (2017). Using pedagogical approaches to influence evidence-based practice integration – processes and recommendations: Findings from a grounded theory study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(4), 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13175
    |
  53. Masso, M., McCarthy, G., & Kitson, A. (2014). Mechanisms which help explain implementation of evidence-based practice in residential aged care facilities: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(7), 1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.11.010
    |
  54. Miller, F., Partridge, H., Bruce, C., Yates, C., & Howlett, A. (2017). How academic librarians experience evidence-based practice: A grounded theory model. Library & Information Science Research, 39(2), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.04.003
  55. Moore, J. (2009). An exploration of the origin of classic grounded theory. Nurse Researcher, 17(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2009.10.17.1.8.c7334
    |
  56. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
    |
  57. Parry, K. W. (1998). Grounded theory and social process: A new direction for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90043-1
  58. Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher–researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11, 10.3402/qhw.v11.30996. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30996
    |
  59. Sebastian, K. (2019). Distinguishing Between the Strains Grounded Theory. Journal for Social Thought, 3(1), 1–9.
  60. Sikolia, D., Biros, D., Mason, M., & Weiser, M. (2013). Trustworthiness of Grounded Theory Methodology Research in Information Systems. MWAIS 2013 Proceedings, 16–21. aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=mwais2013
  61. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications.
  62. Thurlow, L. (2020). Grounded theory and the PhD – notes for novice researchers. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 2(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-05-2020-0079
  63. Toor, S.-R., & Ofori, G. (2008). Grounded theory as an appropriate methodology for leadership research in construction. Proceedings from the International Conference on Building Education and Research (BEAR), 1816–1831.
  64. Urquhart, C. (2002). Regrounding grounded theory-or reinforcing old prejudices? A brief reply to Bryant. JITTA : Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application; Hong Kong, 4(3), 43–54.
  65. van Veggel, N. (2023). The researcher’s voice 4.2: Managing preconceptions through the presuppositional interview. In M. Birks & J. Mills (Eds.), Grounded Theory—A practical guide (3rd edition, pp. 71–73). Sage Publications.
  66. van Veggel, N., & Howlett, P. (2018). Course leadership in small-specialist UK higher education—A review. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(7), 1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2017-0250
    |
  67. Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330.
  68. Xie, S. L. (2009). Striking a Balance between Program Requirements and GT Principles: Writing a compromised GT proposal. The Grounded Theory Review, 8(2), 35–48.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

van Veggel, N., Engward, H., & Howlett, P. (2023). INVESTIGATING HIGHER EDUCATION COURSE LEADERSHIP PRACTICE – AN ARGUMENT FOR USING GROUNDED THEORY. Advanced Education, 11(23), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.288558

Issue

2023: Issue 23

Section

ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Dr Nieky van Veggel, Dr Hilary Engward, Dr Philip Howlett. Article cover has been designed using assets from freepik.com

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).