EXAMINATION OF DIGITAL LITERACY SKILLS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ACCORDING TO VARIOUS VARIABLES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.262190

Keywords:

Digital literacy , digital skills , digital competence, technology, undergraduate students

Abstract

The purpose of this research was aimed to determine the digital literacy skills of undergraduate students studying in different departments of the university according to the variables of gender, type of faculty, and daily internet use. In order to achieve this goal, 388 undergraduate students studying at the Faculty of Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, and Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at İzmir Democracy University were determined as participants. The “Personal Information Form” prepared by the researchers and the “Digital Literacy Scale (DLS)” developed by Bayrakcı & Narmanlıoğlu (2021) and consisting of six sub-dimensions were used as data collection tools. According to the findings of the research, it was determined that the digital literacy levels of the students were moderate. When examined according to the gender variable, a significant difference was found between female and male students in the sub-dimensions of digital literacy levels. When examined according to the faculty variable, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the sub-dimensions of digital literacy levels, Daily Use, Professional Production, and Privacy and Security. As a result of the research, according to the daily internet usage variable, a significant difference was found between the General Knowledge and Functional Skills sub-dimensions of the digital literacy levels of the students according to the daily internet usage time. It is expected that the results obtained will contribute to the literature and draw attention to the development of digital literacy skills of university students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

SİBEL YOLERİ, İzmir Democracy University

Assist. Prof. Dr. Sibel Yoleri, Education Faculty, Department of Preschool Education

Zeynep Nur Anadolu, İzmir Democracy University

Master Student, Education Faculty, Department of Preschool Education  

References

  1. Acar, C. Y (2015). Views of parents on their digital literacy with their primary, secondary and high school students. Unpublished Master Thesis. Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
  2. Adeoye, A.A., & Adeoye, B.J. (2017). Digital literacy skills of undergraduate students in Nigeria universities. Unpublished Master Thesis. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4736&context=libphilprac
  3. Ahmed, S. T., & Roche, T. (2021). Making the connection: Examining the relationship between undergraduate students' digital literacy and academic success in an English medium instruction (EMI) university. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4601-4620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10443-0
    |
  4. Bayrakcı, S. & Narmanlıoğlu, H. (2021a). Digital literacy as whole of digital competences: Scale development study. Thought and Society Journal of Social Sciences, 4,1-30. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1797036
  5. Bayrakcı, S. & Narmanlıoğlu, H. (2021a). Investigation of digital literacy levels of undergraduate students and graduates in Turkey. AJIT-e: Online Journal of Information Technologies, 12(46), 46-67. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ajit-e/issue/64682/954349
  6. Bayrakcı, S., & Narmanlıoğlu, H. (2020). Dijital yetkinlikler bütünü olarak dijital okuryazarlık: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Doktora Tezi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Retrieved: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=prmQl-2va54pZw--BraA_w&no=N20qjRJkP1tSLLp-FVZs8w
  7. Benson, V. & Kolsaker, A. (2015). Instructor approaches to blended management learning: A tale of two business schools. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.10.001
    |
  8. Boyacı, Z. (2019). The relationship between prospective teachers' lifelong learning tendencies and their digital literacy levels: The case of Düzce University. Master's thesis, Sakarya University. https://acikerisim.sakarya.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12619/74532
  9. Council of Higher Education, CHE. (2019). 'Digital Literacy' Course for 30 thousand Students in Universities was accessed from https://basin.yok.gov.tr/InternetHaberleriBelgeleri/İnternet%20Haber%20Belgeleri/2019/113_univ_dijital_okuryazarlik_dersi.pdf on 08.07.2022.
  10. Çetin, O. (2016). Examination of numerical literacy levels of undergraduate science teacher candidates with pedagogical formation program. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 18(2), 658-685. https://doi.org/10.17556/jef.01175
  11. Direkçi, B., Akbulut, S., & Şimşek, B. (2019). Examination of Turkish lesson curriculum (2018) and secondary school Turkish textbooks in the context of digital literacy skills. Eurasian Journal of International Studies, 7(16), 797-813. https://doi.org/10.33692/avrasyad.543868
  12. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 93-106. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-13959-005
  13. European Union (2021). The Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_en/ September, 2022.
  14. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Edition). New York: The McGraw-Hill Company.
  15. Furman, R, L. (2015). Technology, reading and digital literacy: Strategies to engage the reluctant reader. International Society for Technology in Education. Eugene, Oregon-Arlington, VA.
  16. Garcia-Martin, J., & Garcia-Sanchez, J. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of the competence dimensions of digital literacy and of psychological and educational measures. Computers & Education, 107, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.010
    |
  17. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Pub.
  18. Göldağ, B. (2021). Examining the relationship between university students' digital literacy levels and digital data security awareness levels, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 82-100. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.950635
  19. Güngör, N. B., & Kurtipek, S. (2020). Investigation of the effect of individual innovativeness level of sports science faculty students on digital literacy with structural equation model. Journal of Human Sciences, 17(2), 756-767. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v17i2.6021.
  20. Hamutoğlu, N. B., Gungoren, O. C., Uyanık, G. K. & Erdogan, D. G. (2017). Digital Literacy Scale: Adaptation study into Turkish. Aegean Journal of Education, 18(1), 408-429. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.295306
  21. Hardy, C. A. (2005). A Study of Midwest Students' Technology Skills. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Nebraska.
  22. Horne, J. (2007). Gender differences in computerized and conventional educational tests. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00198.x
    |
  23. İnan Karagül, B., Şeker, M., & Aykut, C. (2021). An investigation of students' digital literacy levels during online education due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13 (21) 11878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111878
  24. Karasar, N. (2006). Scientific Research Methods. Ankara: Nobel Spring.
  25. Karasu, M., & Arikan, D. (2016). Examination of the relationship between pre-service teachers' social media usage status and media literacy levels. Aegean Journal of Education, 17(2), 549-566. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.280757
  26. Korkmaz, M. (2020). Determination of digital literacy levels of classroom teachers. Master's thesis, ESOGÜ.
  27. Kozan, M., & Bulut Özek, M. (2019). CEIT department teacher candidates Examination of digital literacy levels and sensitivities regarding cyberbullying. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 29(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538657
  28. Kul, S. (2020). Examining the relationship between digital literacy and other variables and internet addiction. International Journal of Management Information Systems and Computer Science, 4(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.33461/uybisbbd.646682
  29. Lokmic-Tomkins, Z., Choo, D., Foley, P., Dix, S., Wong, P., & Brand, G. (2022). Pre-registration nursing students' perceptions of their baseline digital literacy and what it means for education: A prospective COHORT survey study. Nurse Education Today, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105308.
    |
  30. Maden, S., Maden, A., & Banaz, E. (2018). The evaluation of 5th grade Turkish course books within the context of digital literacy. The Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20185537239
  31. Markauskaite, L. (2006). Gender issues in preservice teachers’ training: ICT literacy and online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1304
  32. McDougall, J., Readman, M., & Wilkinson, P. (2018). The uses of (digital) literacy. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462206
    |
  33. Ministry of National Education, MEB. (2018). Secondary school mathematics course (9th, 10th, 11th and 12th grades) curriculum. Ankara: Board of Education and Discipline. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=343 on 10.07.2022.
  34. Morgan, A., Sibson, R., & Jackson, D. (2022). Digital demand and digital deficit: conceptualizing digital literacy and gauging proficiency among higher education students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(3), 258-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2030275
    |
  35. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
    |
  36. Onursoy, S. (2018). Digital literacy levels of university youth: A study on Anadolu University students. Gümüşhane University Faculty of Communication Electronic Journal, 6(2), 989-1013. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.422671
  37. Özden, M. (2018). Digital Literacy Perceptions of the Students in the Department of Computer Technologies Teaching and Turkish Language Teaching. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.3
  38. Özerbaş, M. A., & Kuralbayeva, A. (2018). Evaluation of digital literacy levels of Turkish and Kazakhstan teacher candidates. Journal of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Education, 5(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.314761
  39. Özoğlu, C. (2019). The relationship between prospective teachers' lifelong learning tendencies and their digital literacy (Anadolu University Faculty of Education example). Master's thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences.
  40. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved on 19.07.2022 from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_.
  41. Timur, B., Timur, S. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2014). Determining the numerical competence levels of teacher candidates. Muğla University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 33, 41-59. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/musbed/issue/23267/248345
  42. Law, N., Woo, D., de la Torre, J. and Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy for indicator 4.4.2. Information Paper 51. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved June, 2020 from https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf
  43. UNICEF. (2017). State of the world's children 2017: Children in a digital world. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/turkiye/media/4291/file/World%20Children's%20Durumu%202017:%20Dijital%20bir%20dunyada%20Children.pdf
  44. Yazıcıoğlu, A., Yaylak, E., & Genç, G. (2020). Digital literacy levels of pre-school and primary school teacher candidates. ODU Journal of Social Sciences Research, 10(2). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/odusobiad/issue/56076/686913
  45. Yeşildal, M. & Kaya, Ş. D. (2021). Yetişkin bireylerde dijital okuryazarlık ve sağlık okuryazarlığı arasındaki ilişki: KONYA örneği. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(2), 174-181. DOI: 10.34108/eujhs.774808
  46. Yılmaz, A., Kaya, M., Akca, N., & Sönmez, S. (2019). Investigation of digital literacy levels of health sciences faculty students. 3rd International 13 National Congress on Health and Hospital Administration, Sakarya. Proceedings Book (pp. 287-297). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339209308_SAGLIK_BILIMLERI_FAKULTESI_OGRENCILERININ_DIJITAL_OKURYAZARLIK_DUZEYLERININ_INCELENMESI
  47. Zogheib, S. (2006). Explaining computer use among preservice teachers: Towards the development of a richer conceptual model incorporating experience, demographic, motivation, personality, and learning style clusters of variables. Unpublished Thesis. University of Windsor. Retrieved from: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3032&context=etd

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

YOLERİ, S., & Nur Anadolu, Z. . (2022). EXAMINATION OF DIGITAL LITERACY SKILLS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ACCORDING TO VARIOUS VARIABLES. Advanced Education, 9(21), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.262190

Issue

2022: Issue 21

Section

ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2022 SİBEL YOLERİ

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).