MASTERING LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT ESP CLASSES USING TED TALKS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.226733

Abstract

The paper demonstrates the results of the experimental research conducted during the first semester of the academic year 2020/21, including the remote learning period due to the Covid19 pandemic situation, at the lessons of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) (with students of Specialties 208 “Agrarian Engineering” and 141 “Electrical Engineering and Energy”) at the State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilia, Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The research basically analyses how TED (Technology, Entertainment, and Design) Talks impact university students’ listening comprehension and speaking skills. Online study support for ESP was personally created by the educators as a four-credit course due to ECTS in the Moodle Learning Management System (LMS) with the application of TED Talks, which was used for study purposes on the B1 level. The research sample is represented by 50 students majoring in Agrarian Engineering and 50 students majoring in Electrical Engineering and Energy, all of them enrolled in the mandatory subject of ESP. The subjects (students) were divided into the experimental and control groups. At the beginning of the course, the students wrote the pre-test, for their start level to be evaluated, and at the end of the semester - the post-test was done to check the achievements and probable benefits of TED Talks. The experiment results demonstrated the improvement of both groups while it was proved statistically that the experimental group showed better outcomes both in listening comprehension and speaking skills respectively. The questionnaires, distributed among the students, consisted of 5 questions, where they expressed their personal opinions about the e-learning process, and according to which the TED Talks influence on their listening and speaking skills was evaluated. The feedback of the questionnaires proved that the students mostly had a positive attitude concerning engaging TED Talks into the learning process, especially those who were involved in the experiment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oksana Kuntso, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilia

Foreign languages Department, Master in Philology, Teacher of English, German and Latin

Yuliia Voloshchuk, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilia

Director of Educational and Scientific Institute of Correspondence and Distance Education, ScD in Economics, Associate Professor

References

  1. Bates, A.W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education (2nd ed.). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203463772
  2. Brownlee, J. (2019). Statistical methods for machine learning: Discover how to Transform Data into Knowledge with Python. Machine Learning Mastery Pty. Ltd. Retrieved from https://dokumen.pub/statistical-methods-for-machine-learning.html
  3. Byrne, T. (2007). Marrying two existing software packages into an efficient online tutoring tool. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701746039
    |
  4. Chaikovska, O., Zbaravska, L., & Bilyk, T. (2019). Podcasts in teaching EFL for students majoring in engineering. Proceedings of 18th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development (pp.1915-1920). Jelgava, Latvia. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N344
    |
  5. Derrington, C., & Groom, B. (2004). A Team Approach to Behaviour Management. Paul Chapman Publishing. Retrieved from https://childhealthanddevelopment.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/different-types-of-listening.pdf
  6. Donesch-Jezo, E., & Misztal, I. (2012). Developing ESP e-learning course: How an e-learning course was created for medical university students. International Journal of Learning, 18(8), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v18i08/47700
  7. Flowerdew, J., Miller L. (2014). Second Language Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Force-AFASES,1.
  8. Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133-167. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt225oa
  9. Hamburg, H., Lindecke, C. & Thij, ten H. (2003). Social aspects of e-learning and blending learning methods. 4th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE E-COMM-LINE 2003, Bucharest. Retrieved from https://www.iat.eu/aktuell/veroeff/2003/hamburg03.pdf
  10. Harb, G.K. (2018). TED Talks: an approach for activating the world knowledge schema of EFL writers. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(4), 76-85. http://doi.org/10.30845/ijll.v5n4p9
  11. Humeniuk, I. (2020). Distance learning – pros and cons. All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference. Problems of humanization of education in higher education institutions of Ukraine (pp. 105-108). Kamianets-Podilskyi,. http://188.190.33.55:7980/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7470/1/konf170520.pdf
  12. Kučirkova, L., Kučera, P., & Vostra Vydrova, H. (2014). English for specific purposes e-learning experimental research. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(3-4), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070306
  13. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham L., & Lee, S. (2014). A Look at the Research on Computer-Based Technology Use in Second Language Learning. A Review of Literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250-273. http://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
  14. McLeod, S. (2019). What a p-value tells you about statistical significance. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/p-value.html
  15. Ockey, G. J. (2007). Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening tests. Language Testing, 24(4), 517-537. Retrieved from http://www.learntechlib.org/p/63798/
    |
  16. Oye, N.D., Salleh, M., & Iahad, N. A. (2012). E-Learning Methodologies and Tools. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(2), 48-52. http://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2012.030208.
  17. Renukadevi, D. (2014). The Role of Listening in Language Acquisition; the Challenges & Strategies in Teaching Listening. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 4(1), 59-6. Retrieved from http://www.ripublication.com/ijeisv1n1/ijeisv4n1_13.pdf
  18. Roliak, A. (2019). ICT implementation in the system of teacher education: Nordic dimension. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 69(1), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.33407/ITLT.V69I1.2361
  19. Rubenstein, L. D. (2012). Using TED talks to inspire thoughtful practice. The teacher educator, 47(4), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.713303
  20. Rudneva, M., Valeeva, N., Faizi, R., Guslyakova A., Nigmatzyanova Y. (2019). TED Talks for enhancing listening comprehension skills at university level. INTED2019 Proceedings (pp.5070-5073). http://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1261
  21. Sharpe, N.R., De Veaux, R.D., & Velleman, P.F. (2010). Business Statistics. Boston: Addison Wesley.
  22. Takaesu, A. (2013). TED Talks as an Extensive Listening Resource for EAP Students. Language Education in Asia, 4(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I2/A05/Takaesu
  23. Wu, Chia-Pei (2020). Implementing TED Talks as authentic videos to improve Taiwanese students’ listening comprehension in English language learning. Arab World English Language Journal. Special issue on CALL, 6, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.2

Downloads

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Humeniuk, I., Kuntso, O., Popel, N., & Voloshchuk, Y. (2021). MASTERING LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT ESP CLASSES USING TED TALKS. Advanced Education, 8(17), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.226733

Issue

Section

ARTICLES