LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL STUDIES INTEGRATION INTO SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCE COURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.166857Abstract
This article reveals the meaning and content of the linguistic and cultural studies integration into social and political science course in the training of future politicians. The article reflects the importance of linguistic and cultural studies for the formation of language competence of students as well as skills of political communication, for understanding the characteristics of the country’s social and political issues. The interdisciplinary approach emphasises the relationship in the study of linguistic, cultural, and political agenda, characterises the interdisciplinary essence of regional studies. The critical discourse analysis (CDA) of political texts was chosen as the key methodological strategy for the efficient development of political communication and problem-solving skills. The authors propose the implementation of a special interdisciplinary course for the first-year students majoring in philology and political studies, focused on the studying the political and cultural features of a language-targeted country by means of CDA. We compared the results of students’ political communication skills development prior and post- course period and we observed the improvement according to the following criteria: perception of the vocabulary and functional language structures (by 17%); analysis of cultural and political agenda from the explicit and implicit language structures (by 23%); text annotation (by 50%); text production, distribution and target audience analysis (by 10%). Moreover, it was observed that CDA implementation facilitated the development of critical thinking skills as well as the skills of texts decoding.
Downloads
References
- Aljiffri, I. (2010). Effects of the Integrated Approach to Teaching English and Social Studies. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 11 (3), 11-31. Retrieved 10 January 2019 from https://sites.google.com/site/tijepa2010/home.
- Chambers, A. (2005). Integrating corpus consultation in language studies.Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 111-125. Retrieved 15 March 2019 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ846327
| - Dijk, T.A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Eggins, S. (2004) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics.London, UK:Continuum
- Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., Clair St., L., &Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of in-service science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
- Angel, L. (2014). Critical Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics: A Methodological Review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 34: 213–232. doi:10.1017/S0267190514000087
| - Morska, L., Horpinich, T., &Olendr, T. (2018).Teaching Medical Students’ Professional English Reading on the Basis of Individual Cognitive Learning Styles. Science and Educatin, 2, 86-93. Retrieved 10 January 2019 from http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/118
- Mullet, D. R. (2018).A General Critical Discourse Analysis Framework for Educational Research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18758260
| | - O'Byrne, W. I., &Pytash, K. E. (2015). Hybrid and blended learning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(2), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.463
| | - Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. Retrieved 10 January 2019 from https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cwse2015
- Rahimi, Elahe (May 2015). "Critical Discourse Analysis and Its Implication in English Language Teaching: A Case Study of Political Text". Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5 (3), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0503.08
- Roth, W. M. (2010). Learning environments research, lifeworld analysis, and solidarity in practice. Learning Environments Research, 2, 225-247.https://doi.org/12.11193/34114188-2010-2
- Stanley, G. (2013). Language learning with technology: ideas for integrating technology in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Starfield, S. (2014).Revue française de linguistiqueappliquée/Current and Future Directions in English for Specific Purposes Research. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, XIX (1), 9-14. Retrieved 15 July, 2018 from http://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-linguistique-appliquee-2014-1-page-9.htm?ref=doi
- Toolan, M. (Ed.) (2009). .Language Teaching: Integrational Linguistic Approaches. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882269
- Wodak, R., Meyer , M. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Wojciech Pomykalo, Oksana Omelchenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).