EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES OF MEDICAL STUDENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.154723

Keywords:

diagnostics, professional qualities, criteria, validity, method, expert assessment, training, workshop

Abstract

 

Currently, the higher medical education should reflect a practical sphere of public health care as well as improvement of the quality of education of future doctors. Doctor’s activities involve almost all spheres of human life; therefore, the problem of training a highly skilled expert is urgent in the sphere of public health as doctors should have high professional and ethical expertise for more effective functioning of medicine. The research was conducted in the 2016/17 academic year at the Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry of I. Horbachevsky Ternopil State Medical University among 286 third-year and fourth-year students: 140 students of the experimental group (EG) and 146 students of the control group (CG). 24 experts (specialists in medicine) took part in the ascertaining phase of the pedagogical experiment. The special study course “Professionally important qualities of future doctors” in the EG was carried out in the form of experimental teaching while in the CG the traditional methods of teaching were used. The comparison of the results of students’ professional qualities evaluation obtained before and after the experiment allows us to state that there is a substantial increase in professionally important qualities of the EG students compared to the CG students. This paper mainly presents the idea that professional (ability to apply knowledge into practice, ability to work with a specialised literature, ability to remember a large amount of information, knowledge and use of foreign language in professional activity, adequate professional self-assessment, desire for improvement) and volitional (responsibility for the life and health of a patient, fast reaction and ability to take decisions, resistance to psychical and emotional stresses, restraint and persistence, self-control) qualities are the most important professional qualities of future doctors. Therefore, moral (attentiveness, decency, honesty, mercifulness, altruism) and social qualities (responsibility, communicative skills, tolerance, ability to build trust) are less significant for future doctors. The experimental testing of the level of professional qualities development of medical students has proved that future doctors should interpret theoretical knowledge into practical activities, constantly improving it by working with expert literature, should be able to control their emotions and react quickly in critical situations.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maria Kichula, I.Horbachevsky State Medical University, Department of Foreign Languages, PhD of Pedagogy

Phd of Padagogy, assitant professor of Foreign languages department

Kateryna Oleksii, I.Horbachevsky State Medical University, Department of Foreign Languages, PhD of Pedagogy

Phd of Philology, assitant professor of Foreign languages department

Tetiana Korolova, I.Horbachevsky State Medical University, Department of Foreign Languages, PhD of Pedagogy

Phd of Padagogy, assitant professor of Foreign languages department

References

  1. Alekseeva, I. Yu. (2007) Diagnostika professionalno vazhnykh kachestv [Diagnostics of professionally important qualities]. St. Petersburg: Piter.
  2. Archer, R., Elder, W., Hustedde, C., Milam, A., & Joyce, J. (2008). The theory of planned behavior in medical education: A model for integrating professionalism training. Medical Education, 42, 771-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03130.x.
    | |
  3. Cottrell, S, Samora, J.B, & Shumway, J. (2012). An Analysis of First-Year Medical Student Comments in a Peer Evaluation of Professionalism. Medical Science Educator, 17(1), 27-32. Retrieved May 25, 2019, from http://www.iamse.org/mse-article/an-analysis-of-first-year-medical-student-comments-in-a-peer-evaluation-of-professionalism/
  4. Khripunova, L.D. (2014) To the question of the formation of personal qualities of future doctors by means of combat sports. Physical education of students, 18(5), 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2014.0508.
  5. Barr, D.A. (2010). Science as superstition: Selecting medical students. Lancet, 376 (9742), 678-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61325-6
    | |
  6. Karelin, A. (1999). Tests assess communication skills. Technological tests. Moscow, Russia: Vologda Regional Universal Scientific Library. Retrieved May 25, 2019, from https://www.booksite.ru/fulltext/tes/ty2/psy/hol/ogy/2.htm.
  7. Kyshakevych, Yu. L. (2001). Iierarkhiia tsinnostei u vykhovanni studentskoi molodi [Hierarchy of values in the upbringing of student youth]. Novi tekhnolohii navchannia: Nauk.-metod. Zb., 31, 81-86.
  8. Nestel, D, Robbe, J, & Jones, V. (2005). Personal and professional development in undergraduate health sciences education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education; 32(2), 228-236. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.32.2.228
    | |
  9. Nikogosyan, L. & Aseyeyva, Yu. (2017). Aksyolohichnyi pidkhid do navchannia maibutnikh medychnykh spetsialistiv [Axiological Approach in Future Medical Specialists’ Training]. Science and education, 30(4), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-4-6
  10. Matsko, L., Pryshchak, M. & Pervushyn, T. (2018) Fundamentals of psychology and pedagogy. Laboratory Workshop. Retrieved May, 25, 2019, from https://posibnyky.vntu.edu.ua/opp/19.html.
  11. Orlov, Yu.M. (2018). Test - oprosnik Potrebnost' v dostizheniyakh tseli. Shkala otsenki potrebnostey v dostizheniyakh uspekha [A questionnaire need to achieve the goal. A scale for assessing the need for success]. Psychology of happy life. Retrieved May, 25, 2019, from https://psycabi.net/testy/475-metodika-orlova-yu-m-test-oprosnik-potrebnost-v-dostizhenii-tseli-shkala-otsenki-potrebnosti-v-dostizhenii-uspekha
  12. Passi, V., Doug, M., Peile, E., Thistlethwaite, J., & Johnson, N. (2010). Developing medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Education, 1, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4bda.ca2a
  13. Powis, D. (2010). Improving the Selection of Medical Students. Non-Academic Personal Qualities Should be Taken into Account. British Medical Journal, 340, 432-433. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c708
    | |
  14. Savchenko, L. (2005). Vyvchennia tsinnisnykh oriientatsii suchasnoi studentskoi molodi [Studying the value orientations of modern student youth]. Ridna shkola, 8, 39-41.
  15. Stern, D. (2005). Measuring Medical Professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Veloski, J.J., Fields, S.K., Boex, J.R. & Blank, L.L. (2005) Measuring professionalism: a review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002. Academic Medicine, 80(4), 366-370. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200504000-00014.
    | |

Downloads

Published

2019-12-18

How to Cite

Kichula, M., Oleksii, K., & Korolova, T. (2019). EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES OF MEDICAL STUDENTS. Advanced Education, 6(13), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.154723

Issue

Section

ARTICLES