active learning methods, educational technologies, educational activity, students of engineering specialіties, extracurricular work


The subject of the research is the analysis of the development experience and the first phase of implementation of the model of extracurricular work with students of engineering specialties at Chernihiv National University of Technology (Ukraine), which was developed on the basis of the author's methodology ALM (active learning methods) at Tallinn University of Technology (Estonia) in combination with forms and methods of extracurricular work. The purpose of this model is to promote the enhancement of the motivation of students in engineering specialіties to succeed in learning. The main task of the research is to evaluate the readiness of students of engineering specialіties to participate in extracurricular activities and their awareness of the forms and methods of extracurricular work, the analysis of the first results of the implementation of the model of extracurricular work of students of engineering specialіties. For the observing stage of the experiment, such methods were used as theoretical, empirical, pedagogical experiment, mathematical and statistical methods. Participants were 92 students of the 3rd year of engineering specialіties of Chernihiv National University of Technology. Most students (82%) believe that extracurricular work has an impact on the formation of the individual and on the professional growth of a future specialist. The motivation for success among most respondents (73%) is average, 33% of respondents are not very good interlocutors who have shortcomings in communication; 60% have an average level of communication skills, 58% of respondents need to build self-confidence. Based on the received results from the questionnaire and tests carried out among students, a model of extracurricular work with students of engineering specialіties has been developed. The first stage of the implementation of this model has shown a positive dynamics. The model requires further testing and research of the impact on the students’personality.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Valerii Vodovozov, Tallinn University of Technology

PhD, Researcher (Academic), Professor,  Department of Electrical Engineering

Zoia Raud, Tallinn University of Technology

PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering

Tetiana Detsiuk, Chernihiv National University of Technology

PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor,  Department of Social Work


  1. Anderman, E.M., C.C. Austin, & Johnson, D.M. (2002). The development of goal orientation. In Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J.S. (Eds.). The Development of Achievement Motivation (pp.197-220). NY, USA: New York Academy Press.
  2. Blaj, C. & Toader, D. (2016). Bologna process not (yet?) a success for electric and electronic engineering at UPT, International Symposium on Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering (ISFEE), Bucharest, Romania, 1-5. Retrieved August, 11, 2017, from
  3. Detsiuk, Т.М. (2014). School of tutors as a condition for the formation of professional competence. Bulletin of Cherkasy University. Series: pedagogical sciences, 30 (323), 60-65. Retrieved July, 4, 2018, from
  4. Dym, C.L. (2004). Design, systems, and engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20 (3), 305-312.
  5. Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 175-187.
  6. Hsieh, T. H. & Huang, H. C. (2014). Happy studying by gamificational role playing. International Conference on Orange Technologies. Hian, China, 69–72. Retrieved August 2, 2017, from
  7. Hsiung, C. M. (2012). The effectiveness of cooperative learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 119-137.
  8. Islim, O.F. (2017). Technology-supported collaborative concept maps in classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19 (2), 131-143.
  9. Lin, L. (2015). Investigating Chinese HE EFL classrooms: Using collaborative learning to enhance learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  10. Karelin, A. (1999). Test assess communication skills. Technological tests. Moscow, Russia: Vologda Regional Universal Scientific Library. Retrieved May 13, 2018, from
  11. Knoster, T. (1991). Leading and Managing Complex Change. Retrieved June, 12, 2017, from
  12. Lopez-Fernandez, D., Alarcon, P. & Tovar, E. (2015). Motivation in engineering education. A framework supported by evaluation instruments and enhancement resources, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tallinn, Estonia, 421–430. Retrieved June, 21, 2017, from
  13. Matsko, L., Pryshchak, M. & Pervushyn, T. (2018) Fundamentals of psychology and pedagogy. Laboratory Workshop. Retrieved May, 13, 2018, from
  14. Mikhnenko, G. & Absaliamova, Y. (2018) The formation of intellectual mobility of engineering students through integration of foreign language education and professional training. Advanced Education, 9, 33-38.
  15. Orlov, Yu.M. (2018) Test - questionnaire need to achieve the goal. A scale for assessing the need for success. Psychology of happy life. Retrieved May, 13, 2018, from
  16. Raud, Z., Vodovozov, V., Aksjonov, A. & Petlencov, E. (2017). Promotion of the Students’ Succes in Higher Engineering Education. 58th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON). Retrieved August, 4, 2018, from
  17. Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. Routledge.
  18. Shmatkov, D. (2016) The use of causal maps as interdisciplinary didactic reduction method. Advanced Education, 6, 16-21.
  19. Stavytska, I. (2017) The formation of foreign language competence of engineering students by means of multimedia. Advanced Education, 7, 123-128.




How to Cite

Vodovozov, V., Raud, Z., & Detsiuk, T. (2018). THE MODEL OF EXTRACURRICULAR WORK WITH STUDENTS OF ENGINEERING SPECIALTIES. Advanced Education, 5(10), 55–61.