concept ‘crime’, conceptual metaphor, cognitive theory of metaphor, cognitive model, orientation, ontological, structural metaphors


This paper is a study of conceptual metaphors that represent the concept ‘crime’ in the contemporary U.S. media discourse. The theoretical background is based on Cognitive Theory of Metaphor by G. Lakoff that considers metaphor as a cognitive structure that helps understand a complex idea (the target domain) by assigning to it qualities found in a familiar/simple object (the source domain). The main question is how the notion ‘crime’ is conceptualised in the U.S. periodicals, thus shaping social views of it. In order to find an answer, a survey of 1213 fragments of 232 newspaper articles with metaphoric collocations naming the concept ‘crime’ has been conducted. By applying cognitive theory of metaphor analysis to metaphoric expressions, three types of conceptual metaphors have been singled out: structural, ontological, and orientation. The data suggest that orientation metaphors of the concept ‘crime’ are most pervasive in the U.S. media discourse (61% of the total number of collocations), with structural metaphors occupying the second position (38%), and ontological metaphors being the least frequent (1%). Orientation metaphors feature the trajectory of crime in space: up – down, forward – backward, from the centre – to the centre, and are used to represent statistics of the crime rate. Structural metaphors ‘crime is an enemy’, ‘crime is the element of nature’, ‘crime is a disease’, ‘crime is a weed’, ‘crime is goods’, ‘crime is a hazardous substance’ model the strategies of crime rate reduction for ordinary Americans. Ontological metaphors ‘crime is mire’, ‘crime is food’, ‘crime is a beast’ highlight such cognitive features of crime as dirt, harm, and danger.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oksana Oliinyk, Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian Pedagogical University

Chair of Translation, Applied, and General Linguistics


Liudmyla Naumenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

doctor of philology, associate professor


  1. Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., Gerring, R. J. (1995). Metaphor-Based Schemas and Text Representations: Making Connections Through Conceptual Metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 612-625.
  2. Armstrong, Sarah. (2009). Managing Meaning: The Use of Metaphor in Criminal Justice Policy.
  3. Atlanta Journal Constitution (2001, 15 Mar). Retrieved January 24, 2918, from:
  4. Atlanta Journal Constitution (2015, 11 Feb). Retrieved January 24, 2918, from:
  5. Atlanta Journal Constitution (2008, July/August). Retrieved January 24, 2918, from:
  6. Berger, B. L. (2002). Trial by Metaphor: Rhetoric, Innovation, and the Juridical Text. Court Review, The Journal of the American Judges Association, 39(3), 1-9. Retrieved December 11, 2017, from:
  7. Berger, L. (2007). Of Metaphor, Metonymy and Corporate Money: Rhetorical Choices in Supreme Court Decisions on Campaign Finance Regulation. Mercer Law Review, 58. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from:
  8. City Journal (2013, winter). Retrieved December 11, 2017, from:
  9. City Journal (1991, autumn). Retrieved October 7, 2017, from:
  10. City Journal (1996, spring). Retrieved October 7, 2017, from:
  11. City Journal (2001, autumn). Retrieved October 9, 2017, from:
  12. City Journal (2005, autumn). Retrieved October 9, 2017, from:
  13. City Journal (2002, spring). Retrieved October 9, 2017, from:
  14. City Journal (1998, winter). Retrieved October 11, 2017, from:
  15. City Journal (2011, spring). Retrieved October 11, 2017, from:
  16. City Journal (2006, summer). Retrieved October 11, 2017, from:
  17. City Journal (2007, spring). Retrieved October 16, 2017, from:
  18. City Journal (2007, autumn). Retrieved October 16, 2017, from:
  19. City Journal (2008, spring). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from:
  20. City Journal (2003, spring). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from:
  21. City Journal (2000, winter). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from:
  22. City Journal (2013, summer). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from:
  23. Daily News (2015, 15 May). Retrieved December 4, 2017, from
  24. Gubby, H. (2016). English Legal Terminology : Legal Concepts In Language. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
  25. Gurnham, D. (2016). Law's Metaphors: Introduction. Journal of Law and Society, 43(1), 1-7.
  26. Hanne, M. (2016). Crime and Disease: Contagion by Metaphor. In C. Stanton & H. Quirk (Eds.), Criminalising Contagion: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Disease Transmission and the Criminal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316135631.004
  27. Holt, E., & Johnson, A. (2010). Socio-pragmatic aspects of legal talk: police interviews and trial discourse. In M. Coulthard, & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp.21-36). New York, NY : Routledge.
  28. Johnson M. (2010). Metaphor and cognition. In D. Schmicking, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science (pp. 401-414). Dordrecht : Springer.
  29. Kellig, G. (1991). Crime and Metaphor: Toward a New Concept of Policing. City Journal. Autumn 1991. Retrieved December 11, 2017, from:
  30. Kendall-Taylor, N., & Haydon, A. (2014). Space to think: Using Metaphor to Expand Public Thinking about Criminal Justice Reform. Studies in Media and Communication, 2 (2), 13-23.
  31. Kooistra, P. (1989). Criminals As Heroes: Structure, Poser, and Identity. Bowling Green, OH: Popular Press.
  32. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Lakoff, G, & Johnson, M. (1980a). Conceptual metaphor in everyday use. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 453-486.
  34. Lakoff G., & Johnson, M. (1980b). The Metaphorical Structure of Human Conceptual System. Cognitive Science, 4, 195-208.
  35. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980c). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Larsson, S. (2017). Conceptions in the Code: How Metaphors Explain Legal Challenges in Digital Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Li, Chen, & Xiao, Han (2017). A Contrastive Study of Conceptual Metaphor in Chinese and American Courtroom Discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7 (11), 1065-1074. DOI:
  38. Marmor, A. (2014). The Language of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Potter, R. (2018). The “Crime as a Disease” Metaphor: Vision, Power, and Collaboration in Social Problems Research. In M. Hanne & R. Weisberg (Eds.), Narrative and Metaphor in the Law (pp. 200-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108381734.014
  40. Richard, I. (2014). Metaphors in English for Law: Let Us Keep Them! Metaphor Studies in the English Language, 8. Retrieved January 4, 2018, from:
  41. Simon, J. (2001). Governing through Crime Metaphors. Brookline Law Review, 67, 1035-1070.
  42. Smith, M. R. (2007). Levels of metaphor in persuasive legal writing. Mercer Law Review, 58, 919-947.
  43. Stevanovic, M. (2014). Hot on the Trail of Deadly Criminals: Conceptual Metaphors Employed by Law Enforcement Officers. British and American Studies, 20, 29-36. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from:
  44. The Houston Chronicle (2015, 12 Feb). Retrieved January 18, 2018, from:
  45. The Huffington Post (2013, 3 Mar). Retrieved January 18, 2018, from:
  46. The New York Times (2015, 29 Oct). Retrieved January 18, 2018, from:
  47. The Washington Post (2015, 27 Nov). Retrieved December 13, 2017, from:
  48. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky L. (2011). Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2). Retrieved November 3, 2017, from:
  49. Walker, S. (2011). Sense and Nonsense About Crime, Drugs, and Communities: A Policy Guide. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Gengage Learning.
  50. Young, A. (1996). Imagining Crime. London, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.




How to Cite

Oliinyk, O., & Naumenko, L. (2018). METAPHORIC REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT ‘CRIME’ IN THE U.S. MEDIA DISCOURSE. Advanced Education, 5(10), 134–140.