METAPHORIC REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT ‘CRIME’ IN THE U.S. MEDIA DISCOURSE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.135687

Keywords:

concept ‘crime’, conceptual metaphor, cognitive theory of metaphor, cognitive model, orientation, ontological, structural metaphors

Abstract

This paper is a study of conceptual metaphors that represent the concept ‘crime’ in the contemporary U.S. media discourse. The theoretical background is based on Cognitive Theory of Metaphor by G. Lakoff that considers metaphor as a cognitive structure that helps understand a complex idea (the target domain) by assigning to it qualities found in a familiar/simple object (the source domain). The main question is how the notion ‘crime’ is conceptualised in the U.S. periodicals, thus shaping social views of it. In order to find an answer, a survey of 1213 fragments of 232 newspaper articles with metaphoric collocations naming the concept ‘crime’ has been conducted. By applying cognitive theory of metaphor analysis to metaphoric expressions, three types of conceptual metaphors have been singled out: structural, ontological, and orientation. The data suggest that orientation metaphors of the concept ‘crime’ are most pervasive in the U.S. media discourse (61% of the total number of collocations), with structural metaphors occupying the second position (38%), and ontological metaphors being the least frequent (1%). Orientation metaphors feature the trajectory of crime in space: up – down, forward – backward, from the centre – to the centre, and are used to represent statistics of the crime rate. Structural metaphors ‘crime is an enemy’, ‘crime is the element of nature’, ‘crime is a disease’, ‘crime is a weed’, ‘crime is goods’, ‘crime is a hazardous substance’ model the strategies of crime rate reduction for ordinary Americans. Ontological metaphors ‘crime is mire’, ‘crime is food’, ‘crime is a beast’ highlight such cognitive features of crime as dirt, harm, and danger.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oksana Oliinyk, Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian Pedagogical University

Chair of Translation, Applied, and General Linguistics

instructor

Liudmyla Naumenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

doctor of philology, associate professor

References

  1. Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., Gerring, R. J. (1995). Metaphor-Based Schemas and Text Representations: Making Connections Through Conceptual Metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 612-625.
    |
  2. Armstrong, Sarah. (2009). Managing Meaning: The Use of Metaphor in Criminal Justice Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1508340
  3. Atlanta Journal Constitution (2001, 15 Mar). Retrieved January 24, 2918, from: http://www.ajc.com
  4. Atlanta Journal Constitution (2015, 11 Feb). Retrieved January 24, 2918, from: http://www.ajc.com
  5. Atlanta Journal Constitution (2008, July/August). Retrieved January 24, 2918, from: http://www.ajc.com
  6. Berger, B. L. (2002). Trial by Metaphor: Rhetoric, Innovation, and the Juridical Text. Court Review, The Journal of the American Judges Association, 39(3), 1-9. Retrieved December 11, 2017, from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/133
  7. Berger, L. (2007). Of Metaphor, Metonymy and Corporate Money: Rhetorical Choices in Supreme Court Decisions on Campaign Finance Regulation. Mercer Law Review, 58. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from: http://works.bepress.com/linda_berger/5/
  8. City Journal (2013, winter). Retrieved December 11, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/gop-and-city-13527.html
  9. City Journal (1991, autumn). Retrieved October 7, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/crime-and-metaphor-toward-new-concept-policing-12733.html
  10. City Journal (1996, spring). Retrieved October 7, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/taking-back-streets-11779.html
  11. City Journal (2001, autumn). Retrieved October 9, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/keeping-new-york-safe-terrorists-12197.html
  12. City Journal (2005, autumn). Retrieved October 9, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/who%E2%80%99s-killing-new-orleans-12429.html
  13. City Journal (2002, spring). Retrieved October 9, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/racial-profiling-myth-debunked-12244.html
  14. City Journal (1998, winter). Retrieved October 11, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/crime-war%E2%80%99s-next-battles-11783.html
  15. City Journal (2011, spring). Retrieved October 11, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/radical-graffiti-chic-13369.html
  16. City Journal (2006, summer). Retrieved October 11, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/new-york-cops-still-finest-12951.html
  17. City Journal (2007, spring). Retrieved October 16, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/baghdad-bayou-13007.html
  18. City Journal (2007, autumn). Retrieved October 16, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/reclamation-skid-row-13041.html
  19. City Journal (2008, spring). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/criminal-justice-system-racist-13078.html
  20. City Journal (2003, spring). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from: http://www.city-journal.org
  21. City Journal (2000, winter). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/criminal-justice-system-racist-13078.html
  22. City Journal (2013, summer). Retrieved January 22, 2018, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/stand-your-ground-new-york-11238.html
  23. Daily News (2015, 15 May). Retrieved December 4, 2017, from http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/rival-motorcycle-gangs-behind-shooting-texas-restaurant-article-1.2225691
  24. Gubby, H. (2016). English Legal Terminology : Legal Concepts In Language. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
  25. Gurnham, D. (2016). Law's Metaphors: Introduction. Journal of Law and Society, 43(1), 1-7.
    |
  26. Hanne, M. (2016). Crime and Disease: Contagion by Metaphor. In C. Stanton & H. Quirk (Eds.), Criminalising Contagion: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Disease Transmission and the Criminal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316135631.004
  27. Holt, E., & Johnson, A. (2010). Socio-pragmatic aspects of legal talk: police interviews and trial discourse. In M. Coulthard, & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp.21-36). New York, NY : Routledge.
    |
  28. Johnson M. (2010). Metaphor and cognition. In D. Schmicking, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science (pp. 401-414). Dordrecht : Springer.
  29. Kellig, G. (1991). Crime and Metaphor: Toward a New Concept of Policing. City Journal. Autumn 1991. Retrieved December 11, 2017, from: https://www.city-journal.org/html/crime-and-metaphor-toward-new-concept-policing-12733.html
  30. Kendall-Taylor, N., & Haydon, A. (2014). Space to think: Using Metaphor to Expand Public Thinking about Criminal Justice Reform. Studies in Media and Communication, 2 (2), 13-23.
  31. Kooistra, P. (1989). Criminals As Heroes: Structure, Poser, and Identity. Bowling Green, OH: Popular Press.
  32. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Lakoff, G, & Johnson, M. (1980a). Conceptual metaphor in everyday use. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 453-486.
    |
  34. Lakoff G., & Johnson, M. (1980b). The Metaphorical Structure of Human Conceptual System. Cognitive Science, 4, 195-208.
    |
  35. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980c). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Larsson, S. (2017). Conceptions in the Code: How Metaphors Explain Legal Challenges in Digital Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Li, Chen, & Xiao, Han (2017). A Contrastive Study of Conceptual Metaphor in Chinese and American Courtroom Discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7 (11), 1065-1074. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0711.15
  38. Marmor, A. (2014). The Language of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Potter, R. (2018). The “Crime as a Disease” Metaphor: Vision, Power, and Collaboration in Social Problems Research. In M. Hanne & R. Weisberg (Eds.), Narrative and Metaphor in the Law (pp. 200-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108381734.014
  40. Richard, I. (2014). Metaphors in English for Law: Let Us Keep Them! Metaphor Studies in the English Language, 8. Retrieved January 4, 2018, from: https://lexis.revues.org/251
  41. Simon, J. (2001). Governing through Crime Metaphors. Brookline Law Review, 67, 1035-1070.
  42. Smith, M. R. (2007). Levels of metaphor in persuasive legal writing. Mercer Law Review, 58, 919-947.
  43. Stevanovic, M. (2014). Hot on the Trail of Deadly Criminals: Conceptual Metaphors Employed by Law Enforcement Officers. British and American Studies, 20, 29-36. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from: https://litere.uvt.ro/publicatii/BAS/pdf/no/bas_2014.pdf
  44. The Houston Chronicle (2015, 12 Feb). Retrieved January 18, 2018, from: http://www.chron.com
  45. The Huffington Post (2013, 3 Mar). Retrieved January 18, 2018, from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/crime/
  46. The New York Times (2015, 29 Oct). Retrieved January 18, 2018, from: http://www.nytimes.com
  47. The Washington Post (2015, 27 Nov). Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions
  48. Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky L. (2011). Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2). Retrieved November 3, 2017, from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    |
  49. Walker, S. (2011). Sense and Nonsense About Crime, Drugs, and Communities: A Policy Guide. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Gengage Learning.
  50. Young, A. (1996). Imagining Crime. London, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-26

How to Cite

Oliinyk, O., & Naumenko, L. (2018). METAPHORIC REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT ‘CRIME’ IN THE U.S. MEDIA DISCOURSE. Advanced Education, 5(10), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.135687

Issue

2018: Issue 10

Section

Linguistics

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Oksana Stepanivna Oliinyk, Liudmyla Petrivna Naumenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).