IMPLEMENTATION OF THOMAS GORDON’S COMMUNICATIVE PEDAGOGY IN UKRAINIAN EDUCATIONAL REALITIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.132446

Keywords:

communicative pedagogy, Thomas Gordon, implementation, research, attitude, language skills, pedagogical and language competence, future teacher

Abstract

The article analyses the possibilities of using the communicative pedagogy of the American scientist Thomas Gordon in the Ukrainian educational space in the medium of English language. The communicative pedagogy emphasises the need for special pedagogical approaches that allow teachers to interact tolerantly with students in the atmosphere of acceptance and trust. The goal of our research was to verify the hypothesis that CLIL approach while studying Thomas Gordon’s heritage in English, using authentic materials, provides students with the opportunity of deeper understanding his ideas and values. The experiment participants, future teachers, were pre- and post-assessed for the levels of English language and awareness of Thomas Gordon’s approach. Moreover, the efficiency of the language and pedagogy connection was proved by practice supervisors who observed students performance during their practical studying at schools. Due to the application of authentic materials, reading manuscripts in original, listening to Thomas Gordon’s speeches and lectures, students were fully immerged into the researcher heritage and demonstrated a better understanding of his ideas. As practice supervisors claimed, such students demonstrated a higher level of conflict prevention skills, class management skills, tolerant communication with children and created the atmosphere of trust and acceptance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Svitlana Isaieva, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Department of Foreign Languages for Mathematical Faculties, Institute of Philology

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor 

Mariya Leshchenko, The Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Branch in Piotrków Trybunalski

Department of Preschool and Primary Education, Faculty of Social Sciences

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor

Sulaieva Nataliia, Poltava V.G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University

Associate professor, Doctor of pedagogical science
The department of pedagogy and psychology

 

Cite this article in APA style as:

Isaieva, S., Leshchenko, M., & Sulaieva, N. Implementation of Thomas Gordon’s communicative pedagogy in Ukrainian educational realities. Advanced Education, 11, 40-45. DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.132446

References

  1. Cherniak, S. (2017). Domestic and foreign concepts of personal education: theoretical review. Science and Education, 22(2), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-2-5
  2. Fink, L. Dee (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Gordon, T. (2003). Teacher Effectiveness Training. The Program Proven to Help Teachers Bring Out the Best in Students of All Ages. New York, USA: Three rivers press.
  4. Isaieva, S. (2013). English for language competence and educational literacy. Kyiv, Ukraine: TOV PanTot.
  5. Isaieva, S. & Leshchenko, M. (2014). Komunikatyvna pedahohika Tomasa Hordona v suchasnykh osvitnikh realiiakh [The communicative pedagogy of Thomas Gordon in modern educational realities]. Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 4(4), 91-98. Retrieved 12 March 2019 from https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/rpp/4/4/rpp.4.issue-4.xml
  6. Leshchenko, M. (2005). Pedahohichna maisternist uchytelia v alternatyvnykh formakh navchannia: doroha do dytiachykh serdets [Pedagogical competence of the teacher in alternative forms of study: the road to children's hearts]. Visnyk ZHDU im. I. Franka, 24, 12-17. Retrieved 12 March 2019 from https://visnyk.zu.edu.ua/NumberArticles.php?number_id=42
  7. Ogienko, O. (2016). Facilitation in the context of pedagogical activities. Advanced Education, 5, 85-89. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.70621
  8. Repko, A. (2011). Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc; Second edition.
  9. Retter, H. (2005). Komunikacjacodzienna w pedagogice. Gdansk, Poland: GWP.
  10. Shcherbakova, N. (2017). Future Teachers Training in the Field of Instructional Dialogue Organization. Science and Education, 12, 165-170. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-12-24
  11. Soldatenko, M. (2008). Rozvytok pedahohichnoi maisternosti vykladacha v umovakh neperervnoi osvity [Development of pedagogical competence of a teacher in conditions of continuous education]. Hlukhiv, Ukraine: HDPU im. O. Dovzhenka.
  12. Talvio, M., Lonka, R., Komulainen, T., Lintunen, T. (2014). Revisiting Gordon’s Teacher Effectiveness Training: An Intervention Study on Teachers’ Social and Emotional Learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(3), 693-716. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.31
  13. Vaičiūnienė, V., Užpalienė, D. (2012). Authenticity in the context of technologically enriched ESP. Social Technologies, 2(1), 189-201. Retrieved 12 March 2019 from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/26794223
  14. Yalanska, S., Atamanchuk, N. (2017). Psychology of tolerant environment formation in terms of the concept “The New Ukrainian School”. Science and Education, 12(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-1-12

Downloads

Published

2019-04-10

How to Cite

Isaieva, S., Leshchenko, M., & Nataliia, S. (2019). IMPLEMENTATION OF THOMAS GORDON’S COMMUNICATIVE PEDAGOGY IN UKRAINIAN EDUCATIONAL REALITIES. Advanced Education, 6(11), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.132446

Issue

Section

ARTICLES