PREFERRED LEARNING STYLES OF STUDENTS MAJORING IN CHEMISTRY, PHARMACY, TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.131078

Keywords:

learning style, chemistry, pharmacy, design and technology education, Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles

Abstract

Research on students’ preferences in learning styles is a topical issue of modern education because understanding the learning styles promotes individualisation of the teaching process. The existing preferences in learning styles of students of four areas of training have been studied by the Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles. Technology students have the most balanced learning profile: the preference of any style in all dimensions does not exceed 70%. Future chemists and pharmacists are characterised by the apparent preferences of visual, sensitive and active styles (at the level of 80%), as well as a moderate preference of sequential style (~70%). Design students exhibit distinct domination of visual style (>95%) over verbal one (<5%). In three other dimensions, a moderate preference (60-70%) of active, sensitive and sequential styles over reflective, intuitive and global styles is observed. Relative invariance of learning styles has been proved by the results of the survey for pharmacy students: the dominant styles are poorly changed during four years of undergraduate study. Increasing reflectivity, intuitiveness and verbality becomes significant for the fifth year of study. However, such changes may be related not so much to the transformation of personality characteristics, but are caused by the additional selection of students when they join their graduate school. The problem of optimal choice of electronic resources for teaching chemistry was illustrated for future chemists and pharmacists with different preferences in a sensitive-intuitive dimension. One preferred learning style (more than 90% of students are sensitive) dominates among pharmacy students, while up to 20% of chemists have a pronounced intuitive type of learning. The pedagogical approaches, methods and electronic resources for teaching chemistry, are discussed for students of both specialities.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tetiana Derkach, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design

PhD, Head of Department of professional education in technologies and design

References

  1. Bitran, M., Zúñiga, D., Pedrals, N., Padilla, O., Mena, B. (2012). Medical students' change in learning styles during the course of the undergraduate program: from ‘thinking and watching’ to ‘thinking and doing’. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 3(2), e86-e97.
  2. Cetin, B. (2015). Predicting academic success from academic motivation and learning approaches in classroom teaching students. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 8(3), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i3.9316
  3. Chun Lok, K.L., Kuan, C.T. (2016). Personality, Learning Styles, Learning Motivation and Academic Performance: A Study of Macau Business Undergraduates in a Microeconomics Course. European Journal of Business & Management, 8(21), 130-139.
  4. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning A systematic and critical review. London, UK: The Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  5. Derkach, T.M. (2011). Vplyv okremych styliv navchannia na zasvoennia studentamy khimichnykh znan [Influence of Special Aspects of Teaching Styles on Acquisition of Students Chemical Knowledge]. Pedagogika i Psykhologia Professiinoi Osvity, 5, 33-41.
  6. Derkach, T.M. (2013). Application of ICT-based Learning Resources for University Inorganic Chemistry Course Training. European Researcher, 44(3-2), 649-653.
  7. Derkach, T.M. (2016). Electronic resources in teaching basic chemical disciplines at universities. Science and Education, 12, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2016-12-19
  8. Derkach, T., Starova, T. (2017). Preferred learning styles of students of natural field of study. Science and Education, 6, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-6-8
  9. Felder, R.M., Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the Index of Learning Styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.
  10. Felder, R.M., Soloman, B.A. (1997). Index of Learning Styles. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/felderpublic/ILSpage.html
  11. Fowler, L., McGill, D., Armarego, J., Allen, M. (2002). Quantitative learning conversations: Constructivism and its application to learning in an engineering environment. In: Proc. 2002 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). 7–10 July 2002, Perth, Western Australia, 254-262.
  12. Gogus, A., Gunes, H. (2011). Learning styles and effective learning habits of university students: A case from Turkey. College Student Journal. 45(3) 586-600.
  13. Gurpinar, E., Bati, H., Tetik, C. (2011). Learning styles of medical students change in relation to time. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(3), 307-11. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00047.2011.
    |
  14. Hughes, J. M. Fallis, D.W., Peel, J.L., Murchison, D.F. (2009). Learning Styles of Orthodontic Residents. Journal of Dental Education, 3, 319-327.
    |
  15. Ishak, N., Awang, M.M. (2017). The relationship of student learning styles and achievement in history subject. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(3), 3372-3377.
  16. Klauk, E.E. (2007). Design and learning outcomes of Web-based instructional resources focused on the impacts of resource development on Native American lands. Thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences, Montana State University, USA.
  17. Kolmos, A., Holgaard, J.E. (2008). Learning Styles of Science and Engineering Students in Problem and Project Based Education. Presented at 36th SEFI Annual Conference “Quality Assessment Employability and Innovation”, 2-7 July 2008. Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved from: http://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/learning-styles-of-science-and-engineering-students-in-problem-and-project-based-education(db3daec0-8e55-11dd-93c5-000ea68e967b).html.
  18. Kuri, N.P. (2004). Personality types and learning styles: propositions to engineering education. Thesis (Doctorate in Industrial Engineering), Federal University of São Carlos, Brasil.
  19. Laight, D.W. (2004). Attitudes to concept maps as a teaching/learning activity in undergraduate health professional education: influence of preferred learning style. Medical Teacher, 26(3), 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159042000192064
    |
  20. Livesay, G.A., Dee, K.C., Nauman, Jr. E.A., Hites, L.S., & Livesay, G.A. (2002). Engineering Student Learning Styles: A Statistical Analysis Using Felder’s Index of Learning Styles. In: Proc. 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2430. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: American Society for Engineering Education.
  21. Lopes, W.M.G. (2002). ILS—Inventário de Estilos de Aprendizagem de Felder-Soloman: Investigação de sua Validade em Estudantes Universitários de Belo Horizonte. Thesis for the degree of Master of Arts, Universidade Federal de Santa Caterina, Brasil.
  22. Mitchell, E., James, S., D'Amore, A. (2015). How learning styles and preferences of first-year nursing and midwifery students change. Australian Journal of Education, 59(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115587917.
    |
  23. Richardson, J.T.E. (2011). Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 288–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.015
    |
  24. Rosati, P.A. (1996). Comparisons of Learning Preferences in an Engineering Program. In: Proc.1996 Frontiers in Education Conference. 6-9 Nov 1996, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 3, 1441–1444. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.1996.568536
    |
  25. Rosati, P.A. (10-13 November, 1999). Specific Differences and Similarities in the Learning Preferences of Engineering Students. In: Proc. 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session 12C1 (pp.17-22). San Juan, Puerto Rico. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.1999.841625
    |
  26. Russo, C. J., Mertins, L., Ray, M. (2013). Psychological type and academic performance in the managerial accounting course. Journal of Education for Business, 88, 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.672935
  27. Salter, D.W., Evans, N.J., Forney, D.S.(2006). A Longitudinal Study of Learning Style Preferences on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Learning Style Inventory. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0022
    |
  28. Seery N., Gaughran, W.F., Waldmann, T. (2003). Multi-Modal Learning in Engineering Education. In: Proc. 2003 ASEE Conference and Exposition. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.
  29. Surjono, H.D. (2015). The effects of multimedia and learning style on student achievement in online electronics course. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 116-122.
    |
  30. Teevan, C.J., Li, M., Schlesselman, L.S. (2011). Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy. Pharmacy Practice, 9(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1886-36552011000200004
  31. Velusamy, B., Anouncia, S.M. (2013). A narrative review of research on learning styles and cognitive strategies. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 52(1), 23-29.
  32. Wilson, K., Narayan, A. (2014). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.926312
    |
  33. Yaroshenko, O.G., Derkach, T.M. (2012). Porivnyalnyi analiz styliv navchannia studentiv riznych spetsialnostei [Comparative analysis of learning styles for students of different specialities]. Pedagogika i Psykhologia, 1, 43-47.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-16

How to Cite

Derkach, T. (2018). PREFERRED LEARNING STYLES OF STUDENTS MAJORING IN CHEMISTRY, PHARMACY, TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN. Advanced Education, 5, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.131078

Issue

2018: Issue 9

Section

Education

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Tetiana Derkach

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).