GESTURE-VERBAL UTTERANCES FROM THE COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE

Alla Martynyuk

Abstract


The article develops the idea of speech and gesture as an integral system of generation of meaning viewing an individual’s cognitive system as a dynamic, evolving semantic lattice organising semantic items of propositional and imagistic modes around a core meaning: linguistic items (propositions) are linked to ideas, concepts and beliefs as well as to specific feelings, mental states, images of gestures and stereotypic patterns of behaviour. Since gesture and speech are equally engaged in generation of meaning, they are treated in terms of gesture-verbal utterances as minimal material carriers of semantic content, activating the semantic lattice. According to the sphere of human consciousness / sub-consciousness which is basically ‘responsible’ for their production and interpretation, gesture-verbal utterances are divided into rational classifying / qualifying (activating semantic structure to provide information, helping classify or qualify the referents of the utterances), emotional (activating emotional attitudes) and suggestive (activating no semantic content but organising narration over large spans). Rational gesture-verbal utterances are further classified on the basis of the semiotic principle, governing the gestural activation of semantic structure, into deictic (pointing to the referent), iconic (depicting the referent) and symbolic (standing for the referent) and also into literal and metaphoric in accordance with the image-realistic or image-schematic principle of depicting the referent. 


Keywords


generation of meaning; gesture; speech; imagistic mode; propositional mode; semantic lattice.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Birdwhistell, R.L. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201284

Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511620539.

Efron, D. (1941). Gesture and Environment. New York: King’s Crown Press.

Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174220

Fillmore, Ch. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222-253.

Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 18, 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: how our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University P

Hardy, C. (1998). Networks of meaning: A bridge between mind and matter. Wesport, Connecticut; London: Praeger, 1998.

Kelly, S. D., Manning, S.M., & Rodak S. (2008). Gesture Gives a Hand to Language and Learning: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Psychology and Education. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2(4), 569–588. http://dx.doi:10.1111/j.1749–818X.2008.00067

Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example. In A. Siegman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in Dyadic Communication, (pp. 177-210). Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7

Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In M.R. Key (ed.). The Relationship of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, (pp. 207-227). The Hague: Mouton and Co. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813098.207

Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (ed.). Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication, (pp. 131-141). Toronto: Hogrefe.

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807572

Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16-32. http://dx.Doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3

Koskela, A. (2014). Shoes, boots and vertical polysemes: The dynamic construal and conventionality of word senses. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (2), 259-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.2.01kos

Kugler N. (2014). The dynamic construal of epistential meaning. Argumentum, 10, 403-420.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and other dangerous things. What categories reveal about mind. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001

Lakoff, G., & Sweetser, E. (1994). Foreword to Gilles Fauconnier, Mental Spaces, (pp. ix–xlvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511624582.001

Langacker, R. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 2, 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143

Langacker, R. (2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press. http://dx.doi:10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press. http://dx.doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001

Moore, T., & Carling, Ch. (1982). Understanding language: towards a post-Chomskyan linguistics. London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16895-8

Özyürek, A., & Kelly, S.D. (2007). Gesture, brain, and language. Brain and Language 101.181–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.006

Paradis C. (2011). A dynamic construal approach to antonymy. Selected Papers from the 19th ISTAL, (pp. 33-42). Retrieved from www.enl.auth.gr/symposium19/19thpapers/003_Paradis.pdf

Scheflen, A.E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry: Journal of Interpersonal Relations, 27, 316-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403

Scheflen, A.E. (1973). Communication structure: Analysis of a psychotherapy transaction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: the study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press.

Tylén, K., Fusaroli R., Bundgaard P. & Østergaard S. (2013). Making sense together: A dynamical account of linguistic meaning-making. Semiotica, 194, 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0021

Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007

The Concise Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science (2004). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Martynyuk, A. (2016). Kognitivno-kommunikativnaja lingvistika: v poiskah bazovyh principov i metodik analiza [Cognitive-communicative linguistics: in search of basic principles and tools of analysis]. Kognicija, kommunikacija, diskurs, 12, 17-35. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/cognitiondiscourse/vypusk-no12-2016/martynuk-a-p .

Sossjur, F. de. (1977). Trudy po jazykoznaniju. [Papers in linguistics]. (A.A. Holodovich, Transl.). Moscow, Russia: Progress Publ.

References of illustrative material:

The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/user/latenight .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.85314

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Alla Martynyuk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)