Connie Chairunnisa


The purpose of this study is to gain insight on: 1) The Implementation of group investigation model (GIM) in increasing student conceptual achievement, 2) How GIM may improve student’s critical thinking skill, and finally 3) the study addresses some challenges in GIM implementation. To achieve these purposes, classroom action research (CAR) was employed to investigate 19 students taking Educational Program Evaluation module in the second semester 2015/2016 at the Department of Educational Administration in University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia. Data were collected through test, observation, interview, questionnaires and documents. The study found that 1) the practice of GIM improve students’ achievement on the conceptual domain; 2) GIM enhances students’ critical thinking skill; 3) Some challenges identified during GIM implementation include teacher’s teaching orientation and lack of students’ discipline in completing assignments.


Group Investigation Model (GIM); conceptual achievement; educational program evaluation; critical thinking; teaching orientation.

Full Text:



Asmani, J.M. (2011). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Yogyakarta: Laksana.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding the case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Depdiknas. (2002). Pendekatan kontekstual. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum Depdiknas.

Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 175-187.

Hsiung, C. M. (2012). The effectiveness of cooperative learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 119.

Ilyas, H.P. (2015). Critical thinking: Its representation in Indonesian ELT textbooks and education. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of York, UK.

Ilyas, H.P. (2016). Infusing critical thinking into English course books. Journal of ELT Research, 1(1), 113-134.

Lin, L. (2015). Investigating Chinese HE EFL classrooms: Using collaborative learning to enhance learning. Springer.

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490.

Raths, L. E., Wasserman, S., Jonas, A., & Rothstein, A. (1986). Teaching for thinking. New York: Teachers College.

Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. Routledge.

Joni, R.T. (2006). Pembelajaran yang mendidik: Artikulasi konseptual, terapan konsektual, dan verifikasi empirik. Malang: PPS UM.

Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Second Edition. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Publishers.

Sanjaya, W. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta.

Thanthowi Achmad. (1993). Pskilogi pendidikan. Bandung: Angkasa.

Thanthowi Achmad. (2010). Pskilogi pendidikan. Bandung: Angkasa.

The Liang Gie (2000). Belajar Yang Baik Bagi Mahasiswa. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada Univ. Press.

Tsay, M., & Brady, M. (2012). A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 78-89.

Copyright (c) 2016 Connie Chairunnisa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)