INNOVATIONS OF TESTING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES TO STUDENTS OF OTHER MAJORS ONLINE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC AT MILA UNIVERSITY CENTRE, ALGERIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.268278

Keywords:

Distance education, testing ESP, barcode automatic correction, challenges and innovations, Algerian higher education

Abstract

This article examines a very thorny issue of testing English for Specific Purposes through a barcode correction system to evaluate the usefulness of distance education. The fact is that, this system was used for the first time as a type of assessment which focuses on enriching student’s minimum vocabulary in a variety of English for Specific contexts. Henceforth, the barcode correction system is applied in this study on different types of ESP exercises, and they are corrected as they are taught, explained and consolidated in distance education. Using a quantitative approach in order to determine online teaching efficiency, the barcode system is used to correct student’s papers in a total correction time based on a single time 0.45/paper, calculate the rate of mistakes, and diagnose problems of correct answers, and missing marks. The results indicate that there is a high correlation between mistakes and ESP exercises calculated by the correction of barcode reading. Learning has become much more digitized with subject-specific content and simple exercises with specific communicative objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Abderrahim Bouderbane, University Centre of Mila

Faculty of Letters and Languages, Department of English

References

  1. Bahatia V. K., (2002).Applied Genre Analysis: Analytical Advances and Pedagogical Procedures. In A. M. Johns (Eds.), Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives (pp.279-283).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Bonner, E., & Hayo, R. (2018).Augmented and Virtual Reality in the Language Classroom: Practical Ideas. Teaching English With Technology, 18, 3-53. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1186392.pdf
  3. Boutebal, S, E., Yahi, S., &Madani, A., (2021) Impact of Unrealistic Optimism on The Risk of contamination during The Home Confinement of COVID-19 in Algeria. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and development, 12(1), 413-25. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v12i1.13882
  4. De Pietro, O., &Fronter, G. (2012). Mobile Tutoring for Situated Learning and Collaborative Learning in AIML Application Using QR-Code.Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, 799-805. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2012.154
    |
  5. Douglas, D.(2000). Assessing Language for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: CUP.
  6. Douglas, D. (2013). ESP and assessment. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 367-383). WileyBlackwell.
  7. Elaskeri, S., Imran М., Elaskri А., Almasoudi А. (2021). Using Barcode to Track Student Attendance and Assets in Higher Education Institutions. Procedia Computer Science, 184, 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.005
  8. Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. (2007). Language Testing and Assessment: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.
  9. Gomez, A. J., Grepon, B. G., Liwanen, N. G., & Ranido, C. J. C. (2021). Faculty Attendance Monitoring System: An Improved with Barcode Scanner. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/smz6f
  10. Irawan, J., & Prasetya, R. (2022). Utilization of Barcodes for Process Efficiency Recap Assignment Grades. International Journal of Information System & Technology, 5(5), 586-587. Retrieved 22 March 2022 https://doi.org/10.30645/ijistech.v5i5.17
  11. Kakoulli-Constantinou, E. (2018). Teaching in Clouds: Using the G-Suite for Education for the Delivery of two English for Specific and Academic Purposes Courses. The International Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 6(2), 305-17. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1802305C
  12. Law, C., & So, S. (2010). QR Codes in Education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0301.07
  13. Lee, J.-K., Lee, I.-S., & Kwon, Y.-J. (2011). Scan and Learn! Use of Quick Response Codes and Smartphones in a Biology Field Study. The American Biology Teacher, 73 (8), 485-492. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.8.11
  14. Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Plutino, A. (2017). Teachers as awakeners: a collaborative approach in language learning and social media. In Álvarez-Mayo, Carmen; Gallagher-Brett, Angela; Michel, Franck (Eds), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: enhancing employability (pp. 115-125). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.innoconf2016.661
  16. Robertson, S. L. (2019). Interactive digital instruction: pedagogy of the 21st century classroom. In Handbook of research on promoting higher-order skills and global competencies in life and work (pp. 166-180). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6331-0.ch011
  17. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Twitter as a formal and informal language learning tool: from potential to evidence. In Rosell-Aguilar, Fernando; Beaven, Tita; Fuertes Gutiérrez, Mara (Eds), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: integrating informal learning into formal language education (pp. 99-106). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.22.780

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Bouderbane, A. (2022). INNOVATIONS OF TESTING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES TO STUDENTS OF OTHER MAJORS ONLINE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC AT MILA UNIVERSITY CENTRE, ALGERIA. Advanced Education, 9(21), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.268278

Issue

Section

ARTICLES