TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY ONLINE TO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS WITH THE USE OF INTERACTIVE PRESENTATION TOOLS: A CASE STUDY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.227792

Abstract

The study was aimed to analyse the efficiency of teaching sustainability online at ESP classes. The participants of the study were 33 second-year technical university students who studied Sustainable Development issues with the use of interactive presentation platforms Thinglink and Padlet which employed different multimedia resources – text, pictures, sound, animation, video. The students’ attitudes toward sustainability issues before and after the experimental learning was measured with the use of the sustainability consciousness questionnaire developed by Gericke, Boeve‐de Pauw, Berglund and Olsson (2018). The analysis of changes in different parameters of engineering students’ sustainability consciousness showed the feasibility and appropriateness of teaching sustainability in an ESP course. The students’ answers showed an increase in their knowingness of issues of Sustainable Development and their more responsible environmental behaviour, which implies the importance of disseminating knowledge and educating people for building a sustainable future. Based on the results of our study, we can conclude that ESP is a course which can organically integrate sustainability topics into its curriculum and use a wide range of resources and materials about Sustainable Development, since the majority of them are in English and thus can contribute not only to Learning for Sustainability but also to language acquisition. The use of online presentation tools and a wide range of multimedia resources on their platforms makes the learning more interactive and motivating for students and stimulates them to active inquiry into sustainability issues.

Author Biographies

Iryna Lytovchenko, National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

Techical English Department # 2, Associate Professor, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences

Nataliia Yamshynska, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine

Teacher at the Department of  English for Enginering № 2

Neonila Kutsenok, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine

Teacher at the Department of  English for Enginering № 2

Violeta Filatova, Kennesaw State University Kennesaw, Georgia, United States

Student Assistant

Research Assistant

RSO Officer

Kennesaw State University

College of Humanities and Social Sciences

College of Computing and Software Engineering

Department of Foreign Languages

Kennesaw, Georgia, United States 

References

Arbuthnott, K. D. (2009). Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910945954

Balakrishnan, B., Tochinai, F., & Kanemitsu, H. (2020). Perceptions and Attitudes towards Sustainable Development among Malaysian Undergraduates. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p44

Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660

Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., Olsson, D., & Berglund, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 7(11), 15693-15717; https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115693

Buckler, C., & Creech, H. (2014). Shaping the future we want. UN decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014). Final report. Paris, France: UNESCO. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=1682&menu=35

Cotton, D. R. E., Warren, M. F., Maiboroda, O., & Bailey, I. (2007). Sustainable Development, Higher Education and Pedagogy: A Study of Lecturers’ Beliefs and Attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701659061

Fielding, K. S., & Head, B. W. (2012). Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936.

Gericke, N., Boeve‐de Pauw, J., Berglund, T., & Olsson, D. (2018) The Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire: The theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1859

Grosseck, G., Tîru, L.G., & Bran, R.A. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: Evolution and Perspectives: A Bibliometric Review of Research, 1992–2018. Sustainability, 11, 6136. DOI:10.3390/su11216136

Hines, J., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8. doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482

Lavrysh, Y., & Lytovchenko, І. (2019). The case of education for sustainable development approaches implementation at English language classes at the technical university in Ukraine. Pedagogika-Pedagogy, 91(5), 736–749. https://pedagogy.azbuki.bg/en/pedagogics/pedagogyarticle/pedagogyarticle2016-4/the-case-of-education-for-sustainable-development-approaches-implementation-at-english-language-classes-at-the-technical-university-in-ukraine/

Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, І., & Lukianenko, V. (2020). Ecocomposition Integration into ESP Course for Bachelors at a Technical University. The MEXTESOL Journal, 44(1), 1–16. https://www.mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_issue=175#deb2bfa6fd9fc7910014e752018b6ecf

Levine, D. S., & Strube, M. J. (2012). Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 308–326.

Lyons, E., & Breakwell, G. M. (1994). Factors predicting environmental concern and indifference in 13- to 16-year-olds. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600205

Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012). Course Curricular Design and Development of the M.Sc. Programme in the Field of ICT in Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14 (2), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-012-0007-7

Marcos-Merino, J. M., Corbacho-Cuello, I., & Hernández-Barco, M. (2020). Analysis of Sustainability Knowingness, Attitudes and Behavior of a Spanish Pre-Service Primary Teachers Sample. Sustainability, 12(18), 7445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187445

Robelia, B., & Murphy, T. (2012). What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environmental Education Research, 18, 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.618288

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (n.d.). ESD: Building a better, fairer world for the 21st century. http://u4614432.fsdata.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/esd.pdf

WCED (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Pe’er, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: A comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902928422

Downloads

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Lytovchenko, I., Yamshynska, N., Kutsenok, N., & Filatova, V. (2021). TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY ONLINE TO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS WITH THE USE OF INTERACTIVE PRESENTATION TOOLS: A CASE STUDY. Advanced Education, (17), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.227792

Issue

Section

ARTICLES