EFL VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY SAUDI ARABIA UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.202436

Keywords:

vocabulary, EFL learners, L1 interference, vocabulary strategies, Arab learners

Abstract

Language skills depend on the meaning of words and the knowledge of the subject/context. The meanings of words that shape the true understanding of contexts are needed to experience language as a real-life activity. College students in Saudi Arabia struggle to develop desired proficiency in the English language that is required to further advance in their academic endeavours. It has been observed that even the minimum vocabulary level is far to be realised as reality, which consequently has posed a challenge for the various stakeholders to find the most effective strategies for Saudi learners. The present study tries to unfold the basic components which are needed to be in order first before considering the other related factors. In this study, a total of 85 male and female students were asked first appear for the vocabulary test, required to assess if they have achieved their desired levels. Their academic achievement in the specialised vocabulary course and their achievement in the standardised test have been compared with their strategies for language learning. The differences in the responses of the high achievers and the low achievers observed and found that high achievers give importance to all the strategies equally well, whereas the low achievers just focus on meta-cognitive and memory strategies. The results open up new dimensions for the teachers as well as the learners to choose and implement the best practices suited as per their academic and non-academic needs. Besides this, the other stakeholders like material developers, curriculum designers, educators and trainers will also have a macro picture of inside and outside of classrooms so that they could narrow down on the associated elements (motivation, learners’ autonomy, socio-cultural contexts etc.).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sahal R. Alshammari, Northern Border University, Arar

Department of Language & Translation, College of Arts & Sciences

References

  1. Ahmad, J. (2012). Intentional vs incidental vocabulary learning. International Association of Research in Foreign Language Education and Applied Linguistics, ELT Research Journal, 1(1), 71–79. Retrieved from http://www.udead.org.tr/journal
  2. Ahmed, A. H. (2010). Students’ problems with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt : different perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2010.0030
  3. Al-Darayseh, A. M., & Tassi. A. (2014). The impact of using explicit/implicit vocabulary teaching strategies on improving students’ vocabulary and reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.6.1109-1118
  4. Al-Masrai, A., & Milton, J. (2012). The vocabulary knowledge of university students in Saudi Arabia. TESOL Arabia Perspectives, 19(3), 13–19. https://uksacb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Research-Paper-1.pdf
  5. Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2016). Why do Saudi EFL readers exhibit poor reading abilities? English Language and Literature Studies, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n1p1
  6. Alhaisoni, E. (2012a). Language learning strategy use of Saudi EFL students in an intensive English learning context. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n13p115
  7. Alhaisoni, E. (2012b). The effect of writing proficiency on writing planning strategy use: a case study of Saudi learners of English. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.1808
  8. Alhaysony, M. (2012). Vocabulary discovery strategy used by Saudi EFL students in an intensive English language learning context. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 518–535. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i2.1724
  9. Alnefaie, S. K. (2016). Teachers’ role in the development of EFL curriculum in Saudi Arabia: The marginalised status, Cogent Education, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1240008
    |
  10. Alrabai, F. (2014). A model of foreign language anxiety in the Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n7p82
    |
  11. Alrabai, F. (2016). Factors underlying low achievement of Saudi EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n3p21
  12. Alsaif, A., & Milton, J. (2012). Vocabulary input from school textbooks as a potential contributor to the small vocabulary uptake gained by English as foreign language learners in Saudi Arabia. Language Learning Journal, 40(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.658221
    |
  13. Alshammari, S. R. (2016). Improving Saudi English learners’ second-language acquisition in argumentative writing through self-regulated strategy development. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas - Kansas. Retrieved from https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/21995/ Alshammari_ku_0099D_14579_DATA_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  14. Alshammari, S. (2019). Aprendizaje basado en datos y enseñanza de preposiciones en ESL: un estudio de estudiantes árabes (Data driven learning and teaching of prepositions in ESL: A study of Arab learners). IJERI, 153–168. https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/download/3809/3463/12390
  15. Ansarin, A. A., Zohrabi, M., & Zeynali, S. (2012). Language learning strategies and vocabulary size of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(9), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.9.1841-1848
  16. Baniabdelrahman, A. A., & Al-Shumaimeri, Y. (2013). Strategies used by Saudi EFL students to determine the meaning of English words. English Language Teaching, 7(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n1p75
    |
  17. Berry, A. B., & Mason, L. H. (2012). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing of expository essays for adults with written expression difficulties: Preparing for the GED. Remedial and Special Education, 33(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510375469
    |
  18. Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033
    |
  19. Cheng, Hsing-Fu & Dörnyei, Zoltán. (2007). The Use of Motivational Strategies in Language Instruction: The Case of EFL Teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 153-174. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt048.0
  20. De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
    |
  21. De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687
    |
  22. Doushaq, H. H. (1986). An investigation into stylistic errors of Arab students learning English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 5(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(86)90005-0
    |
  23. Elyas, T., & Picard, M. (2010). Saudi Arabian educational history: impacts on English language teaching. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981011047961
  24. Fan, Y. M. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
  25. Glaser, C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2007). Improving fourth-grade students’ composition skills: effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.297
    |
  26. Grami, G. M. A. (2010). The effects of integrating peer feedback into the university-level ESL writing curriculum: A comparative study in a Saudi context. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
  27. Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. .(1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning out- comes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
    |
  28. Hajebi, M., SeddiQ. T., Fahandezh, F., & Salari, H. (2018). The role of web-based language teaching on vocabulary retention of adult pre-intermediate. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 372-378.
  29. Hashim, N. (1996). English syntactic errors by Arabic speaking learners: reviewed. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED423660.pdf (ERIC)
  30. Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: an empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.2.145
  31. Hirsh, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure?. Reading in a Foreign Language, 8(2), 689-699. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.12560417.v1
  32. Hu, M., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.12560354.v1
  33. Huckin, T., Haynes, M., & Coady, J. (Eds.). (1993). Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  34. Ishtiaq, M., Ali, Z., & Salem, M. (2017). An experimental study of the effect of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) on vocabulary learning of EFL adult learners. Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no3.23
  35. Jones, R. (2006). Vocabulary learning strategy use among tertiary students in the United Arab Emirates. Perspective, 14(1), 4-8.
  36. Kansızoğlu, H. B. (2017). The comparison of Vocabulary Teaching Methods in terms of their effect on vocabulary development: A Meta-Analytic Review. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences (IOJES), 9(3), 821-841. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.03.017
  37. Kazamia, V. (2016). Gender and age impact on language learning strategy use: A research on Greek EFL learners. In Z. Gavriilidou & K. Petrogiannis (eds), Language Learning Strategies in the Greek setting: Research outcomes of a largescale project (pp. 76-100). Kavala: Saita Publications.
  38. Köse, T. Çimen, E. & Mede, E. (2016). Perceptions of EFL learners about using an online tool for vocabulary learning in EFL classrooms: A pilot Project in Turkey. International Conference Teaching and Learning English as an Additional Language GlobELT 2016, Nisan 2016, Türkiye: Antalya, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.051
  39. Laufer, B. (1997). The Lexical Plight in Second Language Reading: Words You Don’t Know, Words You Think You Know and Words You Can’t Guess. In J. Coady, & T. Huckin (Eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy (pp. 20-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Lavasani, Masoud & Mirhosseini, Fatemeh & Hejazi, Elaheh & Davoodi, Maryam. (2011). The Effect of Self-regulation Learning Strategies Training on the Academic Motivation and Self-efficacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 627–632. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.285.
  41. Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of foreign-language students. Language Learning, 46(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00642.x
    |
  42. Ma, Qing. 2009. Second language vocabulary acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang.
  43. Masrai, A. (2019). Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0106
  44. Mitits, L. (2014). Language learning strategy use by early adolescent monolingual EFL and multilingual EFL/L2 Greek learners in the Greek educational context. PhD dissertation, Department of Greek Philology, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece, Published in Saita Publications available at http://www.saitabooks.eu/2015/03/ebook.147.html
  45. Mitits, L. & Gavriilidou, Z. (2014). Effects of gender, age, proficiency level and motivation differences on monolingual and multilingual students’ language learning strategies. Studies in Greek linguistics, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics (pp.285-299). School of Philology, Faculty of Philology,.
  46. Mohamed, M., & Mahmoud, A. (2014). The effectiveness of using the cooperative language learning approach to enhance EFL writing skills among Saudi university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 616–625. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.3.616-625
  47. Mohammad, T., & Hazarika, Z. (2016). Difficulties of learning EFL in KSA: writing skills in context. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 105. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n3p105
  48. Nation, I. S. P. (2001a). How many high frequency words are there in English. Language, Learning and Literature: Studies presented to Hakan Ringbom, 4, 167-181. Abo Akademi University, Abo: English Department Publications.
  49. Nation, I. S. P. (2001b). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
  50. O' Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  51. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle.
  52. Oxford, R. L., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Interwoven: culture, language, and learning strategies. SSLLT, 8 (2), 403-426. https://doi.org/ 10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.10
    |
  53. Patterson, D. (2017). Vocabulary-building activities for the EFL classroom. 13th & 14th Annual LaoTESOL Conference Proceedings: Selected Papers (2016-2017) (pp. 164-171) National University of Laos, Vientiane, Laos.
  54. Ping, A. M. & Siraj, S. (2012). Exploring selfregulatory strategies for vocabulary learning among Chinese EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1211-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.802
  55. Platsidou, M., & Sipitanou, A. (2015). Exploring relationships with grade level, gender and language proficiency in the foreign language learning strategy use of children and early adolescents. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(1), 76-101.
  56. Rababah, G. (2002). Communication problems facing Arab learners of English. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1), 180–197.
  57. Rasekh, Z. E., & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. TESL-EJ, 7(2), A-5. https://www.tesl-ej.org/ej26/a5.html
  58. Reed, J. T. & Hooper, D. (2018). Student perceptions of mobile learning of high frequency vocabulary using the "Memrise" app. The Journal of Kanda University of International Studies, 30, 351- 371. http://id.nii.ac.jp/1092/00001486/
  59. Rossell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: A user evaluation of the Busuu app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 854-881.
    |
  60. Sarani, A., & Shirzaei, H. (2016). A comparative study of vocabulary learning strategies employed by Iranian undergraduate and postgraduate EFL learners with a focus on motivation. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Lingusitics, 1(1), 33-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.2
  61. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  62. Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
    |
  63. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975
    |
  65. Soleimani, H., Aghayani, B., & Ashari, N. (2018). The relationship among EFL learners’ self-regulation, locus of control, and preference for vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.08208
  66. Sozler, S. (2012). The Effect of Memory Strategy Training on Vocabulary Development of Austrian Secondary School Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1348-1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.300
  67. Sutarsyah, C., Nation, P., & Kennedy, G. (1994). How Useful Is Eap Vocabulary for Esp? a Corpus Based Case Study. RELC Journal, 25(2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829402500203
  68. Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
    | |
  69. Wang, B.-T., Teng, C.-W., & Chen, H.-T. (2015). Using iPad to facilitate English vocabulary learning. International Journal of Information and Educational Technology, 5(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.484

Downloads

Published

2020-12-20

How to Cite

Alshammari, S. R. (2020). EFL VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY SAUDI ARABIA UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Advanced Education, 7(16), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.202436

Issue

2020: Issue 16

Section

ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Sahal R Alshammari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).