Andiy Kotlovskiy, Nataliya Mykytenko, Andriana Onufriv, Maryana Salamakha


The study shows that language portfolio is an effective tool which is applied in students’ independent work. We aimed to survey students’ views on the usage of language portfolio; to define the types of students’ autonomy with teacher’s guidance that contribute to successful acquisition of lexical and grammatical competences within students’ independent work; to give recommendations to teachers about using language portfolio for building lexical and grammatical competences in ESP speaking. Thus, a mixed research design was employed. The qualitative research design relied on collecting data about students’ attitude to using language portfolio as a tool of building their lexical and grammatical competences in ESP speaking within their independent work. The quantitative research design was focused on interpreting the results and suggesting recommendations regarding students’ independent work in ESP learning. The research was held at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv during December-February of 2019-2020 academic year. The total number of full-time second-year students who took part voluntarily was 250. Also, five ESP teachers participated in the survey. Within the context of the study, the questionnaire was designed to identify students’ attitude towards learning aims, ways to achieve them, type of teacher’s guidance, practicability of keys, instructions, range of suitable techniques. The findings show that the students prefer relative autonomy and half-autonomy with a firm and relatively firm teacher’s guidance to follow while acquiring lexical and grammatical competences in ESP speaking. Most students admit that language portfolio is an effective tool which promotes significant progress in their lexical and grammatical competences in ESP speaking.


lexical and grammatical competence; speaking; independent work; autonomy; language portfolio

Full Text:



Belgrad, S., Burke, K., & Fogarty, R. (2008). Portfolio Connection: Student Work Linked to Standards. 3d ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Blidi, S. (2017). Collaborative Learner Autonomy: A Mode of Learner Autonomy Development. Singapore Springer Singapore Imprint: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2048-3

Chan, V. (2003). Autonomous Language Learning: The teachers’ perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 33-54. doi:10.1080/1356251032000052311

Cooker, L. (2012). Formative (self-)assessment as autonomous language learning. Doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.

Delett, J. S., Barnhardt, S., & Kevorkian, J. A. (2001). A Framework for Portfolio Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34(6), 559-568. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02103.x

Demirel, M. & Duman, H. (2015). The Use of Portfolio in English Language Teaching and its Effects on Achievement and Attitude. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2634-2640. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.598

Golubeva, M. G., Emelianova, N. A., Tuigunova, I. R., Egorova, O. G., & Saveleva, U. A. (2019). The Implementation of CDIO Standards in the Context of ‘TUNING’ Approach when Training Teachers of Foreign Languages. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 7(4), 545-556. doi:10.22190/JTESAP1904545G

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford, Pergamon.

Kamenskaia, L. S. (1999). Nekotorye voprosy organisatsii vneauditornoi samostoyatelnoi raboty studentov pri kommunikativnom obuchenii inostrannomu yazyku v neiazykovom vuze [Some issues of organisation of students’ extracurricular and independent work with communicative teaching of foreign language in tertiary institutes]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov MGLU, 437, 33-42.

Oxford, R. L. (2015). Expanded perspectives on autonomous learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 58-71. doi:10.1080/17501229.2014.995765

Tambovkina, T. Yu. (1998). K probleme avtonomii obuchaiushchikhcia inostrannomu yaziku v pedvuze [To the issue of autonomy of foreign language learners in pedagogical institues]. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole, 4, 84-88.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140. doi:10.1007/bf00869951

Wach, A. (2012). Computer-mediated communication as an autonomy-enhancement tool for advanced learners of English. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 367-389. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.6

Hawkins, M. W. (2018). Self-directed learning as related to learning strategies, self-regulation, and autonomy in an English language program: A local application with global implications Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 445-469. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.12

White, C. (2008). Chapter 1: Language Learning Strategies in Independent Language Learning: An Overview. Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 3-24). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781847690999-003

Zadorozhna, I. P. (2011). Organizatsiia samostiinoi roboty maibutnikh uchyteliv angliiskoimovy z praktychnoi movnoi pidgotovky [Organisation of future English language teachers’ self-study work on practical language training]. Ternopil: TNPU.

Zadorozhna, I., Datskiv, O., & Levchyk, N. (2018). Development of Pre-service Foreign Languages Teachers’ Emotional Intelligence by Means of Reflection. Advanced Education, 10, 62-68. doi: 10.20535/2410-8286.144538

Copyright (c) 2020 Nataliya Mykytenko, Andiy Kotlovskiy, Andriana Onufriv, Maryana Salamakha

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)