THE EFFICIENCY OF QUIZLET-BASED EFL VOCABULARY LEARNING IN PREPARING UNDERGRADUATES FOR STATE ENGLISH EXAM
Keywords:Quizlet, EFL, vocabulary, experimental study, spaced repetition, intensive language courses
Students’ EFL learning experience in the rural context is poorer in comparison to urban quality of education. More than 70% of students at the State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podillia are from rural areas. To reduce rural-urban disparities in academic learning the university teachers should use high-quality instruction techniques that can make the process of studying both effective and motivating. The traditional methods of EFL teaching no longer satisfy the needs of modern society. Hence, technology applications need a theoretical foundation based on experimental surveys to determine the strategies for effective EFL learning. This research paper was conducted to examine the possibility of utilising such MALL technology like Quizlet in improving EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition. A brief review of scholarly literature published from 2005-2019 on Quizlet implementation in foreign language learning showed that there are many studies on the benefits of using Quizlet in EFL vocabulary acquisition. However, the research papers on the principles and strategies for adequate Quizlet-based learning in Ukrainian higher educational institutions are still lacking. Pre- and post-experimental questionnaires, pre- and post-experimental tests were adopted as tools for data collection. The results of the experiment have proven the proposed hypothesis. After utilising Quizlet and using spaced repetition technique for vocabulary learning to prepare undergraduates to state English exam, the results proved that the learners of the experimental group improved their level of EFL vocabulary at the post-test.
Andarab, M. S. (2017). The effect of using Quizlet flashcards on learning English Vocabulary. In M. Vihar (Ed.), Proceedings of 113th IIER International Conference (pp.37-41). Frankfurt, Germany.
Ashcroft, R. J., Cvitkovic, R., Praver, M. (2018). Digital flashcard L2 Vocabulary learning out-performs traditional flashcards at lower proficiency levels: A mixed-methods study of 139 Japanese university students. The Eurocall Review, 26 (1), 14-28.
Ashcroft, R. J., & Imrie, A. C. (2014). Learning vocabulary with digital flashcards. In N. Sonda & A. Krause. (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Barr, B. (2016). Checking the effectiveness of Quizlet as a tool for vocabulary learning. The Centre for ELF Journal, 1 (2), 36-48. Retrieved 11 November 2018 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9ce3/35781dee4292083a046040f97898bcd526ff.pdf
British Council (2019). Online English level test. Retrieved 9 September 2019 from https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/
Chaikovska, O. V., Zbaravska, L. Yu., Bilyk, T. L. (2019). Podcasts in teaching EFL for students majoring in engineering. In A. Aboltis (Ed.), Proceedings of 18th International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development” (pp. 1915-1920). Latvia, Jelgava. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N344
Dizon, G. (2017). Quizlet in the EFL classroom: Enhancing academic vocabulary acquisition of Japanese university students. Teaching English with technology, 16 (2), 40-56. Retrieved 11 November 2019 from from https://www.tewtjournal.org/
Fageeh, I. (2013). Effects of MALL applications on vocabulary acquisition and motivation. Arab World English Journal, 4 (4), 420-447. Retrieved 11 July 2018 from https://awej.org/images/AllIssues/Volume4/Volume4Number4Dec2013/25.pdf
Jackson, D. B. (2015). A targeted role for L1 in L2 vocabulary acquisition with mobile learning technology. Perspectives, 23, (1), 6-11. Retrieved 20 August 2019 from http://issuu.com/tesolarabia-perspectives/docs/feb2015-perspectives.
Kilickaya, F., Krajka, J. (2010). Comparative usefulness of online and traditional vocabulary learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, (2), 55-63. Retrieved 1 October 2019 from https://eric.ed.gov
Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289.x
Lander, B. (2015). Lesson study at the foreign language university level in Japan: blended learning, raising awareness of technology in the classroom. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4 (4), 362-382. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2015-0007
Miangah, T. M., Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3 (1), 309-319. https://doi.org/ 10.5121/ijdps.2012.3126
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2019). Conceptual fundamentals of the State policy on development of the English language in higher education. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from https://mon.gov.ua/
Montaner-Villalba, S. (2019). The use of Quizlet to enhance vocabulary in the English language classroom. In F. Meunier, J. Van de Vyver, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019 (pp. 304-309). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.38.1027
Sanosi, A.B. (2018). The Effect of Quizlet on Vocabulary Acquisition. Saudi Arabia Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 6 (4), 71-76. https://doi. 10.24203/ajeel.v6i4.5446
Shrestha, P. (November 17, 2017) "Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve". Psychestudy. Retrieved 26 December 2019 from https://www.psychestudy.com/cognitive/memory/ebbinghaus-forgetting-curve
Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14 (2), 95-110. Retrieved 6 September 2018 from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol14num2/stockwell.pdf.
Taj, H., Sulan, N. B., Sipra, M. A., & Ahmad, W. (2016). Impact of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on EFL: A Meta-Analysis. Advances in language and literary studies, 7(2), 76-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.2p.76
Copyright (c) 2020 Olha Volodymyrivna chaikovska, Lesia Yuriivna Zbaravska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).