public administration, public policy, universities, learning methods, competencies, curriculum


The paper focuses on the comparative analysis of professional competences development in public management and administration university programmes and the possibilities of implementation of international experience in Ukraine. Using the methods of comparative and system-functional analysis, synthesis and generalisation, the authors concentrate on the features of curriculums in public administration field taking into account the current realities of social development. The most common methods of training in the field of public administration and their practical focus are analysed. Particular attention is paid to the methods of problem-based learning in public administration, including case studies, case scenarios, and simulation games as part of the education gamification. The authors carried out an essential comparison of competences adopted in the European public administration training and those defined in the Ukrainian Standard of Higher Education in this area and revealed that the Ukrainian Standard lacks a pool of competencies related to the development and analysis of public policy.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anatolii Melnychenko, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

Sociology and Law Faculty, Dean

Olena Akimova, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

Theory and Practice of Management Dept., associated professor


  1. Akimova, O., & Melnychenko, A. (2018). Kompetentnisna modelʹ pidhotovky fakhivtsya z publichnoho upravlinnya ta administruvannya v konteksti zaprovadzhennya YEDKI [Competent model of specialist training in public management and administration in the context of the introduction of the joint state qualification exam]. In V. Kujbida, & A. Savkov, & I. Degtyaryova etc. (Eds.), Current issues of training specialists in the field of public management and administration: materials of the annual international conference (pp.14-18). Kyiv, Ukraine: National Academy of State Administration.
  2. Andresani, G., & Ferlie, E. (2006). Studying governance within the British public sector and without: Public Management Review, 8(3), 415-431,
  3. Brans, M., & Coenen, L. (2016). The Europeanization of Public Administration teaching: Policy and Society, 35(4), 333-349. 10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.11.005
  4. Choosing the right degree for you. (n.d.). Retrieved March 20, 2019, from
  5. Cleary, R. E. (1990). What do public administration masters programs look like? Do they do what is needed? Public Administration Review, 50 (6), 663–73.
  6. Harvard Kennedy School. Curriculum. (2019). Retrieved January 15, 2019, from
  7. Douglas, S., Hood, C., Overmans, T., & Scheepers, F. (2019). Gaming the system: building an online management game to spread and gather insights into the dynamics of performance management systems. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1560-1576.
  8. Dunning, P. T. (2019). Why public administration is needed now more than ever: Advancing the scholarship of teaching and learning in public administration: First Public Lecture sponsored by Teaching Public Administration (delivered at the Public Administration Conference, University of Northumbria 12 September 2018). Teaching Public Administration, 37(2),127-134.
  9. Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley. Employment Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2019, from
  10. Engbers, T. A. (2016). Comparative research: An approach to teaching research methods in political science and public administration: Teaching Public Administration, 34(3), 270–283.
  11. Gellen, M. (2013). Public Administration Education in a Legalistic Setting: New Tendencies in Hungarian Public Administration and Training. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 6, 53-67.
  12. Gellen, M. (2014). Public administration education in a continental European legalistic setting: The Hungarian case. Teaching Public Administration, 32, 111-126.
  13. Glennon, R., Hodgkinson, I., & Knowles, J. (2019). Learning to manage public service organisations better: A scenario for teaching public administration. Teaching Public Administration, 37(1), 31–45. Retrieved May 3, 2019, from
  14. Harding, C., Garrett, S., & Wang, S. (2015). Game-playing and understanding decision-making within legal frameworks: The use of computerized simulation. Information & Communications Technology Law, 24(1), 1–15.
  15. Jordan, G. (2001). The modern state and its study: New administrative sciences in a changing Europe and United States. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  16. Kotnik, Ž., & Kovač, P. (2018). Development of public administration and governance in Central and Eastern Europe: Content analysis of the NISPAcee Journal: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11(1), 229-252.
  17. Kovač, P. (2013). The public administration discipline in Slovenia: Between legal and administrative sciences. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 6, 33-52.
  18. Lab, S. (2018). SCIMAGO institutions ranking. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from⁄43300&category1⁄43321
  19. Larat, F. (2017). Developing an integrated and comprehensive training strategy for public sector leaders: The French experience. Teaching Public Administration, 35(1), 88–104.
  20. London School of Economics and Political Science. (2019). MSc international social and public policy programme details. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from
  21. Martíneza, P. A. L., Morenob, J. J. M., & Brage, L. (2014). Analysis of professional competencies in the Spanish Public Administration management. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30, 61-66.
  22. Mouralová, M., Hejzlarová, E. M., Holík, R., Hubáček, M., & Jeřábková, A. (2015). What do diploma theses unveil about academic public policy in the Czech Republic? Central European Journal of Public Policy, 9(2), 164-176.
  23. Nemec, J. (2000). Public administration education: Slovakia. In T. Verheijen (Eds.), Building higher education programmes in public administration in CEE countries (pp. 247-265). Bratislava: NISPAcee.
  24. Nemec, J., Dimeski, B., & Matei, A. (2011). Public management education in Central Europe: how far did we progress? 33rd Annual Conference of EGPA (European Group of Public Administration). Retrieved 10 August 2019 from:
  25. Nemec, J., Larionov, A., & Hintea, C. (2017). National Curricula (Standards) in Public Administration: NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 10(2), 155-169.
  26. Ongaro, E., & Van Thiel, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158.
  28. Profiroiu, A. (2013). Lecturer and student perspective regarding teaching public aministration in Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 9, 141-155. Retrieved 15 May 2019 from:
  29. Raadschelders, J. C., & Lee, K. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from public administration review, 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71, 19-33.
  30. Reichard, C. (1998). Education and training for new public management. International Public Management Journal, 1, 177-194.
  31. Reichard, C., & van der Krogt, T. (2014). Towards a set of specific competences for academic degree programmes in Public Administration in Europe. Retrieved 10 August 2019 from
  32. Rosenbaum, A. (2015). In quest of excellence: Approaches to enhancing the quality of public administration education and training, Bratislava. NISPAcee Press. Retrieved 10 August 2019 from
  33. Silvia, C. (2012). The impact of simulations on higher-level learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 397-422.
  34. Social Policy & Administration. (2017, November 22). Retrieved February 3, 2019, from
  35. Stare, J., & Klun, M. (2018). Required competencies in public administration study programs. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 5, 80-97.
  36. Van Jaarsveldt, L. C., & Wessels, J. S. (2015). Information technology competence in undergraduate public administration curricula at South African universities: International Review of Administraive Sciences, 81(2), 412-429.
  37. Varga, E., Szira, Z., Bárdos, K. & Hajós, L. (2016). The most relevant labour market competencies for employers and their assessment by students. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 11( 2), 95-104.
  38. Verheijen, T. (Ed). (2000). Building higher education programmes in public administration in CEE countries. Bratislava: NISPAcee.
  39. Walsh, R. (2006). Exploring the case study method as a tool for teaching public administration in a cross-national context: Pedagogy in theory and practice. Retrieved 19 August 2019 from
  40. Wildavsky, A. (1985). The once and future school of public policy: The Public Interest, 79, 25-41. Retrieved 20 March 2019 from
  41. Williams, A. M., & Slagle, D. R. (2017). Development and outcomes of a new institutional ranking system for public administration research and scholarship. In K. Downing & F. Ganotice, Jr. (Eds.), World University Rankings and the Future of Higher Education (pp. 277-301). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.




How to Cite