DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN ENGLISH LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT IN NON-LANGUAGE UNIVERSITIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.168585

Keywords:

experiment, differentiated instruction, method, assessment, feedback, foreign language proficiency

Abstract

This paper is aimed at resolving the problem of inadequate level of foreign language proficiency of students in non-language institutions of higher education and discussing effective approaches and methods to improve foreign language instruction at tertiary schools. An analysis of the problem by means of mixed research methods revealed the need to create positive and motivating foreign language learning environment on the basis of preliminary diagnosis through the evidence-based instructional strategies and assessment tools that make a difference in student achievements. The authors substantiate the expediency of applying differentiated instruction as a means of fostering foreign language learning by students of non-language majors, which was proved by the results of the conducted experiment. 116 Bachelor students of the National University of Water and Environmental Engineering in their first year of study took part in the experiment, which was held in academic years 2016–2017 and 2017–2018. The experiment started with the placement test, the results of which allowed grouping first-year students according to their prior knowledge of English into different groups from A1 to B2 CEFR levels. The differentiated instruction was performed in homogenous groups by means of the level-relevant content and materials, teaching methods and assessment tools. The research findings allowed the authors to contribute to improving the course design, implementing differentiated lessons, choosing appropriate teaching methods and gathering feedback. The conducted experiment also helped draw conclusions on the improvement of foreign language learning under newly created conditions, adding to high rate of productivity and flexibility of learning paths. An analysis of the experimental data showed that differentiated instruction can significantly increase students’ motivation to foreign language acquisition and learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Larysa Kupchyk, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering

Associate Professor of the Chair of Foreign Languages

Alona Litvinchuk, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering

Associate Professor of the Chair of Foreign Languages

References

  1. Anderson, K. M. (2007). Tips for teaching: Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.3200/psfl.51.3.49-54
  2. Bespalko, V. P. (1968). Opyt razrabotki i ispol’zovanija kriteriev kachestva usvoenija znanij [Experience in developing and applying evaluation criteria for knowledge acquisition]. Sovetskaja pedagogika, 4, 52-59.
  3. Bigge, M. & Shermis, S. (2004). Learning theories for teachers. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  4. Chesnokova, H. V. & Sergeyeva, M. V. (2011). Bilingvalna sytuatsija v Ukraini, abo Chomu ukrajintsi ne rozmovliajut’ anglijskoju [Bilingual situation in Ukraine, or Why Ukrainians do not speak English]. Humanitarna osvita u vyshchykn technichnykh navchalnykh zakladakh, 23, 82–96. Retrieved 15 Feb. 2019, from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/gotvnz_2011_23_12
  5. Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at www.coe.int/lang
  6. Council of Europe (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptions. Strasbourg Cedex. Retrieved 15 Feb. 2019 from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989
  7. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 (3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555.
  8. Gregory, G.H & Chapman, C. (2013). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size does not fit all. Sage publications.
  9. English for Specific Purposes (ESP) National Curriculum for Universities (2005). Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. British Council Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine: Lenvit.
  10. Grytsyk, N. (2016), Implementing European Standards in the ESP Curriculum for Students of Non-Linguistic Specialities in Ukrainian Universities. Advanced Education, 5, 4-8. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.60757
  11. Heacox, D. (2012). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing Inc.
  12. Hedges, M. R, Pacheco, G. A, & Webber, D. J. (2013). What determines students’ choices of elective modules. Economics Working Paper Series, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. Available at https://www2.uwe.ac.uk/faculties/BBS/BUS/ Research/Economics13/1307.pdf
  13. Ireson, J. & Hallam, S. (2001). Ability grouping in Education. London, Great Britain: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  14. Ismail, S. A.A. & Al Allaq, Kh. (2019). The Nature of Cooperative Learning and Differentiated Instruction Practices in English Classes. SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856450
    |
  15. Little, D. (2012). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, the European Language Portfolio, and language learning in higher education. Language Learning in Higher Education. Journal of the European Confederation of language Centres in Higher Education 1(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2011-0001
  16. Naka, L. (2018). Differentiated Instruction in Foreign Language Learning in Undergraduate Studies. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 42, 101-112. Retrieved on 18.06.2020 from https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JLLL/article/view/41772/0
  17. Niculescu, B.-O. & Obiliʂteanu, G. (2016). Related Aspects between ICT and the Modernization of Differentiared Individualized Teaching of Foreign Languages in Higher Education. Scientific Bulletin, 21(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/bsaft-2016-0033
  18. Nordlund, M. (2003). Differentiated instruction: Meeting the educational needs of all students in your classroom. Maryland, Scarecrow Press.
  19. Nunley, K. (2006). Differentiating the high school classroom: Solution strategies for 18 common obstacles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corbin.
  20. Ortega, D.P., Cabrera, J.M., Banalcásar, J.V. (2018) Differentiated Instruction in the Language Learning Classroom: Theoretical Considartions and Practical Applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(6), 1220-1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.11
  21. Polat, Y.S. (2000). Raznourovnievoye obucheniye [Split-level training]. Inostrannyye yazyki v shkole, 6, 6-11.
  22. Pham, H. L. (2012). Differentiated instruction and the need to integrate teaching and practice. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i1.6710
  23. Rock M. L., Gregg M., Ellis E., Gable R.A. (2008). REACH: A Framework for Differentiating Classroom Instruction. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52(2), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.2.31-47
  24. Spanou, S., Zafiri, M.-N. (2019). Teaching Reading and Writing Skills to Young Learners in English as a Foreign Language Using Blogs: A Case Study. Journal of Language and Cultural EducatHerion, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0009
  25. Stavrou, T. & Koutselini, M. (2016). Differentiation of Teaching and Learning: The Teachers' Perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(11), 2581-2588. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041111
  26. Theisen, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction in the foreign language classroom: Meeting the diverse needs of all learners. The Communiqué, 6, 1-8. Retrieved 15 Nov. 2019 from https://www.sedl.org/loteced/communique/n06.pdf.
  27. Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Roeper Review, 26 (4), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554268
    |

Downloads

Published

2020-07-19

How to Cite

Kupchyk, L., & Litvinchuk, A. (2020). DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN ENGLISH LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT IN NON-LANGUAGE UNIVERSITIES. Advanced Education, 7(15), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.168585

Issue

2020: Issue 15

Section

ARTICLES

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Larysa Kupchyk, Alona Litvinchuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).