Olesia Liubashenko, Zoia Kornieva


The article discusses the outcomes of the research on dialogic interactive skills assessment in teaching Technical English to tertiary school students. The authors propose to implement dialogic collaborative interaction as both the medium of instruction and an alternative assessment tool. Theoretically, the study relies on the assumption that Technical English speaking skills acquisition is carried out through different types of communicative interaction and collaborative dialogic interaction in particular. The procedure proposed for speaking skills assessment has been primarily targeted at sustaining oral collaborative interaction along with assessing students’ communicative competence. The research represented relies on the experimental teaching English speaking skills to the 1st year Bachelor’s students (n=84) at Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute. The assessment criteria include conformity of utterances to the topic; speaking tempo; relative grammatical, lexical and phonetic accuracy; cohesion and coherence; compliance with the stylistic and etiquette conventions of English; diversity of grammatical and lexical devices for reaching mutual understanding between the dialogue participants; the interlocutor’s speaking initialisation; reaching consensus; and background knowledge deduction. The results of the research confirm that the assessment procedure introduced contributes to boosting oral production if the techniques of supporting collaborative dialogic interaction are applied by the interlocutors. Collaborative dialogue positively affects the development of students’ communicative competence and acquisition of such skills as perceiving, understanding and decoding the content of oral texts, identifying the communicative purpose of interlocutor’s utterances through analysing verbal and non-verbal means; defining the style and genre of utterances and aligning them with stylistic registers in English.



collaborative dialogue; dialogic interaction; assessment of speaking skills; experiential teachingdialogue; dialogic interaction; assessment of speaking skills; experiential teaching

Full Text:



Ammar, A. & Hassan, R. (2017). Talking It Through: Collaborative Dialogue and Second Language Learning. Language Learning, 68, 1, 46-82. DOI:10.1111/lang.12254.

Arnó-Macià, E. (2014). Information Technology and Languages for Specific Purposes in the EHEA: Options and Challenges for the Knowledge Society. In E.Bárcena, T.Read, & J.Arús, (Eds.), Languages for Specific Purposes in the Digital Era. Educational Linguistics. Vol 19 (pp. 3-26). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer International Publishing. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-02222-2_1

Banathy, B. & Jenlink, P. (2005). Dialogue as a Means of Collective Communication. NY: Springer.

Beattie, G. & Ellis, A. (2017). The Psychology of Language and Communication. NY: Routledge.

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.

Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language testing, 26 (3), 341-366. DOI:10.1177/0265532209104666

Caspersen, D. (2015). Changing the Conversation: The 17 Principles of Conflict Resolution. NY: Penguin.

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Structured overview of all CEFR scales. (2001). Council of Europe. Retrieved from

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. NY: Collier.

Dobao, F. A. (2012). Collaborative Dialogue in Learner–Learner and Learner–Native Speaker Interaction. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 229-256. DOI:10.1093/applin/ams002

Flecha, R. (2000). Sharing Words. Theory and Practice of Dialogic Learning. Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Freire, P. (2005). Education for Critical Consciousness. NY: Continuum.

International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) (2013). Retrieved January 16, 2018, from

Jenks, C. (2012). Analysis of dialogue. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics: Analysis of discourse and interaction. Malden, MA: Willey-Blackwell. DOI:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0019

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Liubashenko, O. & Yashenkova, O. (2015). Models of communicative interactions as a subject of workplace discourse investigation and instruction. In W. Giordano (Ed.), Discourse, Communication and the Enterprise VIII – DICOEN VIII Pre-conference Proceedings (pp.110-112). Naples: DISES.

Long, M. (2014). Second language acquisition and task‐based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell.

Price, M., Handley K., & O’Donovan, B. (2013). Assessment feedback: An Agenda for Change. In S.Merry, M.Price, & D.Carless (Eds.), Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 41-54). NY: Routledge.

Swain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2012). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 3218-3225). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0664

Tarnopolsky, O., Kornieva, Z., Avsiukevich, Y., Zhevaga, V., & Degtiariova, Y. (2016). Professional Basics. A Textbook of English for 1st Year Students Majoring in Technology and Economics. Student’s Book and Workbook. Vinnytsa: Nova Knyga Publ.

Weigand, E. (Ed.) (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group: NY&London.

Zeng, G. & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-Based Peer-Peer Collaborative Dialogue in a Computer-Mediated Learning Environment in the EFL Context. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 434-446. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2009.01.003

Copyright (c) 2019 Olesia Liubashenko, Zoia Kornieva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)