Maryna Prepotenska, Vania Angelova


The article deals with the specifics of the urban studies teaching in an interdisciplinary field. The authors present two teaching strategies that are universal in their interdisciplinary coverage: the method of mental maps and the concept of the revitalisation of urban locations in terms of theoretical comprehension and practical implementation. Students receive a task typical for a case method: to map the city on the basis of their experiences and preferences and comment on the results. The authors have found out that this process shows not only the urban visual representation, but reflects the existential level of each participant, his/her mental, spiritual, and bodily potential. The authors determine such leading intentions in mastering the city as consumerism (43%), soulfulness (21%), aestheticism (15%), co-creation (13%) and existential closeness (8%). Each type of social behaviour has a wide range of determinants that can be a subject to analysis of a number of disciplines in the sphere of humanities. The stage of perception and practice of the process of revitalisation represents a logical transition from analytical studies to social interaction, which is able to unite participants of urban studies in co-creation in real time. With this in mind, authors claim that some students develop their outlook and communication in the framework of the “creative class” in the “creative city”. Since the method of mental maps and revitalisation exceed the traditional content of these approaches, the article proposes to introduce the term SENSITIVE MAP, reflecting the development of the city on the basis of the “sense of the city” and the meaning of the city residents’ life values.


urban studies; interdisciplinary approach; mental map; revitalisation; existential intentions; sensitive map

Full Text:



Antimantikora (2014, December 20). Nomo urbanus kak novyy vid gominid: differentsialnyy diagnoz [Homo urbanus as a new species of hominids: differential diagnosis] [Blog post]. Retrieved February 15, 2018 from https://anthropology-ru.livejournal.com/529445.html

Baudrillard, J. (1997). Gorod i nenavist: lektsiya, prochitannaya v Moskve vo Frantsuzskom universitetskom Kolledzhe pri MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova [City and hatred. Lecture read in Moscow at the French University College at M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University]. Logos: filosofsko-literaturnyy zhurnal, 9, 107-116.

Bolleter, J. (2017). Exploring how urban design has sought to inspire confidence and longevity in Western Australia’s Pilbara region. Journal of Urban Design, 22 (5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1247645

Brighenti, A.M. & Castelli, A. (2016). Social camouflage: functions, logic, paradoxes. Journal of Social Theory, 17 (2), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2016.1217552

Chalfen, R. & Rich, M. (2007). Combining the Applied, the Visual and the Medical: Patients Teaching Physicians with Visual Narratives. In S. Pink (Ed.), Visual interventions: Applied visual anthropology (pp. 53–70). New York: Berghahn Books.

Chtcheglov, I. (1953). Formulary for a New Urbanism. In K. Knabb (Ed.), Situationist International Anthology. Bureau of Public Secrets.

Claire, W. & Herbert (2017). Like a Good Neighbor, Squatters Are There: Property and Neighborhood Stability in the Context of Urban Decline. City & community, 17(1), 236-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12275

da Vinha, L. (2017). Geographic Mental Maps and Foreign Policy. Re-Mapping the Carter Doctrine. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110524475

Davityan, D. (2016). Kollizey druzey. Kak v KPI prevratili zabroshenny teatr v mesto zhizni [Coliseum of friends: how an abandoned amphitheater has been turned into a place of life in KPI]. Retrieved February, 15, 2018, from https://platfor.ma/magazine/text-sq/projects/kolizei/

de Certeau, M. (2008). Po gorodu peshkom [Walking through the city] (A.Kosmarsky, Trans.). Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 7 (2), 34-40. Retrieved February, 15, 2018 from https://sociologica.hse.ru/2008-7-2/28122457.html

Demicheva, A. V.(2013). Perspektyvy mis`kyh doslidzhen`: mozhlyvi napryamky ta praktyyka provedennya [Prospects for urban research: possible directions and practice of conducting]. Granі, 8, 149-155. Retrieved February, 15, 2018 from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Grani_2013_8_21

Flew, T. (Ed.) (2013). Creative industries and urban development: Creative cities in the 21st century. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315868639

Florida, R. (2005). Kreativnyy klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut budushchee [The Rise of The Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life] (A.Konstantinov, Trans.). Moscow, Russia: Klassika-XXI.

Foucault, M. (2009). Le Corps utopique suivi de Les Hétérotopies [The Utopian Corps followed by Heterotopias]. France, Fécamp: Nouvelles Éditions Lignes.

Hillier, B., & Vaughan, L. (2007). The city as one thing. Progress in Planning, 67, 205-230.

Jégou F. (March, 2012). Guided tour of the human cities toolbox widespread exhibition. In R. Houlstan-Hasaerts et al. (Eds.), HUMAN CITIES. Civil Society Reclaims Public Space. Cross Perspectives Based on Research. International Symposium Proceedings (pp.151-154). Brussels, BE.

Khamіtov, N., Garmash, L., & Krilova, S. (2015). Istoriya filosofiyi: problema lyudyny ta yiyi mezh. Vstup do filosofs'koyi antropolohiyi yak metaantropolohiyi [The history of philosophy: the problem of а man and his boundaries. Introduction to philosophical anthropology as metanthropology]. Kyiv, Ukraine: KNT.

Landry, C. (2000). The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. L.: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blacrwell.

Lose, S. (2016). Homo Urbis. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Unpubleashed: Biuro Festiwalowe Impart.

Lynch, K. (1982). Obraz goroda [The image of the city] (V. L. Glazycheva, Trans.). Moscow, Russia: Stroyizdat

Mayer, M. (2017). Cities as sites of refuge and resistance. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(2),171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417729963

Norberg-Shults, K. (2012). Zizn’ imeet mesto [Life takes place]. Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov, 39 (Prilozhenie). Retrieved February, 15, 2018, from http://archvuz.ru/2012_33/1

Oberzaucher, E. (2017). Homo urbanus. Ein evolutionsbiologischer Blick in die Zukunft der Städte [Homo urbanus. An evolutionary biological view into the future of the cities]. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53838-8

Paquot, Th. (1990). Homo urbanus: Essai sur l'urbanisation du monde et des mœurs [Homo urbanus: Essay on the urbanisation of the world and manners]. Paris: Editions du Félin.

Paquot, Th. (Ed.) (2015). Les situationnistes en ville [Situationists in the city]. Paris: Infolio.

Pardo, I. & Prato, В. (2012). Anthropology in the city: Methodology and theory. Routledge.

Park, R. (2002). Gorod kak sotsialnaya laboratoriya [City as a social laboratory]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2 (3), 3-12. Retrieved February, 15, 2018 from https://sociologica.hse.ru

Prepotenska, M.P. (2014). Homo urbanus: fenomen lyudini megapolіsu: monografіya [Homo urbanus: the phenomenon of megacity human]. Dnіpropetrovsk, Ukraine: Vid. Serednyak T.K.

Ramlee, M., Omar D., Mohd Yunus R., & Samadi, Z. (2015). Revitalization of Urban Public Spaces: an Overview. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 360-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.187

Roymer, Y. (2017). Homo Urbanus (Ya. Dovgopoliy, Trans.). Kyiv, Ukraine: Vid-vo Zhupanskogo.

Sassen, S. (2005).Globalnye goroda: postindustrialnye proizvodstvennye ploshchadki [Global cities: post-industrial production sites]. Prognozis, 4, 266–280.

Sheller, M. (1988). Polozhenie cheloveka v kosmose [Man's position in space] (P. S. Gurevich, Trans). In Yu.N. Popov (Ed.), Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [The problem of a man in Western philosophy] (pp.31-95). Moscow, Russia: Progress.

Soboleva, K.V. (2014). Vizualnye strategii sotsialnoy identifikatsii v sovremennom rossiyskom gorode: na primere Sankt-Peterburga [Visual strategies of social identification in the modern russian city (on the example of St. Petersburg)]: Unpublished PhD dissertation, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia: Herzen State Pedagogical University.

Strecker I. A. (2000). The Genius Loci of Hamar. Northeast African Studies, 7 (3), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1353/nas.2005.0009

Tymіnski, V. (2013). Chy ye u postradyans`ky`x mist majbutnye? Pryklad Svitlovods`ka. In S.Shlipchenko et al. (Eds.), Misto j onovlennya. Urbanisty`chni studiyi (pp.205-216). Kyiv, Ukraine: FOP Moskalenko O. M.

Veber, M. (1990). Gorod. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Сity. Selected works] (Yu. N. Davydova, Ed.). Moscow, Russia: Progress.

Voznyak, T. S. (2013). Fenomen mіsta [The phenomenon of the city]. Lvіv, Ukraine: Nezalezhniy kul'turologíchniy zhurnal "Ї".

Wirth, L. (2005).Urbanizm kak obraz zhizni [Urbanism as a way of life]. In L.Wirth (Ed.), Izbranye raboty po sotsiologii [Selected works in sociology] (V.G.Nikolaeva, Trans.) (pp.93-118). Moscow, Russia: INION RAN.

Zimmel, G. (2002). Bolshie goroda i dukhovnaya zhizn [Big cities and the spiritual life]. Logos, 3-4, 95-117. Retrieved February, 15, 2018 from http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/34/02.pdf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.133988


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Maryna Prepotenska, Vania Angelova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)