COGNITIVE AND ONTOLOGICAL ESSENCE OF AXIOLOGICAL DOMINANTS AND PRINCIPLES OF THEIR TAXONOMY IN DIACHRONIC AND SYNCHRONIC REVIEW

Nataliia Stefanova

Abstract


The article provides a critical outline of elucidation of the cognitive and ontological essence of axiological dominants with the representatives of different cultures of language and a definition of the principles of their taxonomy in diachronic and synchronic review. The author makes a hypothesis that philosophical and axiological thoughts on this matter have not been homogeneous as in diachronic sense of its study (in particular, in the ancient world, the Middle Ages and Modern period etc.) so as in synchronic segment. It is proved that despite the ancient philosophers’ efforts such major value concepts as “Truth”, “Good”, “Beauty”, “Benefit” were left without clear understanding. Thus, they were not differentiated. The attempts of philosophical categorisation and conceptualisation remained to be undertaken by Renaissance scientists and thinkers. However, the notion “value” gets its philosophic status only in the Modern period, which was critical for the development of values taxonomy. The article argues that only after establishment of axiology as an independent philosophical doctrine it was possible to articulate four fundamental principles of the values structure: ontological, which makes it possible to explain scientifically the existential localisation of values and their correlation to human existence; gnoseological (or cognitive), with the help of which we experience values and necessity to study their correlation on the basis of both formalised principle, which is used for general rules of taxonomic hierarchy of values, and conceptual principle, which reveals the essence of values and determines their place in the defined hierarchy. The researcher introduces a new ethnosemiometric vector of axiological issues development directly within linguistics, which will enable to assess axiological dominants with the representatives of different cultures of language relying on the given values taxonomy and values hierarchy.


Keywords


axiological dominants; culture of language; ontological principle; cognitive principle; formalised principle; conceptual principle; ethnosemiometry; taxonomic hierarchy of values

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrushchenko, V.P. (Ed.) (2002). Filosofskyi slovnyk sotsialnykh terminiv (2002) [Philosophical Dictionary of Social Terms]. Kharkiv: Korvin.

Ambrose, A. (1933) A Controversy in the Logic of Mathematics. The Philosophical Review, 42 (6), 594–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2180008

Iliin, V. V. (2005). Aksiologiya [Axiology]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU.

Kagan, M. S. (1997). Filosofskaya teoriya tsennosti [Philosophical theory of values]. Sankt-Peterburg: TOO TK Petropolis.

Kant, I. (1965). Sochineniya: V 6 T. (T.4). [Works in 6 volumes (Volume 4)]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mysl.

Kapranov, Y. V. (2018). Hypothetical Versions on Antropogenesis Localization of the First Populations of the Homo. Logos, 94, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2018.15

Korolyova, A. V. (2018). Reconstruction of Early Migration Routes of Homo Populations. Logos, 94, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2018.16

Luzondo, A. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2017). Argument-structure and implicational constructions in a knowledge base. Onomazein, 35, 25-48. http://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.35.04

Rikkert, H. (1998). Nauki o prirode, nauki o culture [The sciences of nature and the science of culture]. Moscow: Respublica.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2017). Conceptual complexes in cognitive modelling. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.30.1.12rui

Serebrennikova, E. (Ed.) (2011). Lingvistika i aksiologiya: etnosemiometriya tsennostnykh smyslov [Linguistics and axiology: ethnosemiometry of value meanings]. Moscow: Tezaurus.

Shokhin, V.K. (2010 a). Aksiologiya. In V.S.Stepin (Ed.), Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4t. [New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 vol.]. Moscow: Institut Filosofii. Retrieved May 15, 2018 from https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH0147b7e8f087b539ec51af47

Shokhin, V.K. (2010 b). Tsennost. In V.S.Stepin (Ed.), Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4t. [New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 vol.]. Moscow: Institut Filosofii RAN. Retrieved May 15, 2018 from https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library?el=&a=d&c=newphilenc&d=&rl=1&href=http:%2f%2f3342.html

Shokhin, V. K. (2006). Filosofiya tsennostey i rannyaya aksiologicheskaya mysl [Philosophy of values and early axiological thought]. Moscow: Izd-vo RUDN.

Sitaram, K. S., & Cogdell, R. T. (1976). Foundations of intercultural communication. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Stolovich, L. N. (1994). Krasota. Dobro. Istina: Ocherk istorii esteticheskoy aksiologii [Beauty. Good. Truth: Essay on the history of aesthetic axiology]. Moscow: Respublica.

Vysheslavtsev, B. P. (1955). Vechnoye v rysskoy filosofii [Eternal in Russian Philosophy]. N.-Y.: Izd-vo imeni Chekhova.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.131680

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Nataliia Stefanova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)