differentiated ESP instruction, individual autonomy, group autonomy, IT students


This study was aimed to check the effectiveness of links between individual and group autonomy of information technology (IT) students who studied ESP at university with the use of differentiated tasks. The mixed type of research was used. The study was held in 2020-2021 academic year and involved 40 IT students of the Physics and Technology Department of National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”. For the purpose of the study we used a three-degree individual autonomy model involving the partial autonomy, semi-autonomy and conditionally full autonomy degrees, and a two-degree group autonomy including the minimum and relatively maximum degrees. Both models were based on the criteria of motivation; goal, content and procedure; control and reflection. The significantly and insignificantly effective links between individual and group autonomy of IT students in differentiated ESP instruction were identified. The relatively maximum degree of group autonomy combined with individual semi-autonomy of IT students, as well as the relatively maximum degree of group autonomy combined with conditionally full individual autonomy of IT students were found significantly effective. In contrast, the combinations of the minimum degree of group autonomy with partial individual autonomy of IT students, as well as the minimum degree of group autonomy with conditionally full individual autonomy of IT students were found insignificantly effective. It was concluded that the promotion of the individual and group autonomy in differentiated ESP instruction should be based on individual characteristics of students.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oksana Synekop, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Department of English for Engineering, Faculty of Linguistics, Doctor of Philosophy, assistant professor


  1. Bailey, D. E. & Adiga, S. (1997). Measuring Manufacturing Work Group Autonomy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(2), 158-174.
    | |
  2. Blumberg, M. (1980). Job switching in autonomous work groups: An exploratory study in a Pennsylvania coal mine. The Academy of Management Journal, 23, 287-306.
  3. Borova, T., Chekhratova, O., Marchuk, A., Pohorielova, T., & Zakharova, A. (2021). Fostering Students’ Responsibility and Learner Autonomy by Using Google Educational Tools. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(3), 73-94.
  4. Cohen, S. G. & Ledford, G. E. (1994). The effectiveness of self-managed teams: a quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47(1), 13-43.
  5. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment Companion Volume with New Descriptors, Language Policy Programme Education Policy Division Education Department Council of Europe. (2018, February). Retrieved 23 May 2019 from
  6. Cordery, J. L., Mueller, W. S. & Smith, L. M. (1991). Attitudinal and behavioral effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. The Academy of Management Journal, 34, 464-476.
  7. Everhard-Theophilidou, C. J. (2012). Degrees of autonomy in foreign language learning. (PhD dissertation). Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics School of English, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki.
  8. Everhard, C. J. (2015). The Assessment-Autonomy Relationship. In C. J. Everhard, L. Murpy (Ed.), Assessment and Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 8-34). 1st ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Fisher, R. A. (2017). Statistical methods for research workers. Delhi: Kalpaz, New Delhi, India : Distributed by Gyan Books Pvt. Ltd.
  10. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests (2nd edition). London: Heinemann.
  11. Hutten, I. (2003). Planning learning: the role of teacher reflection. In D. Little, J. Ridley, E. Ushioda (Ed.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment (pp. 122-134). Dublin: Authentik.
  12. Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training and Development Journal, 44(11), 79-83.
  13. Jönsson, B., Lank, A. G. (1985). Volvo: A report on the workshop on production technology and quality of working life. Human Resource Management, 24(4), 455-465.
  14. Judy Shih, H. (2020). The use of individual and collaborative learning logs and their impact on the development of learner autonomy in the EFL classroom in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(3), 195–209.
    | |
  15. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74.
  16. Kohonen, V. (2001). Towards experiential foreign language education. In V. Kohonen, R. Jaatinen, P. Kaikkonen & J. Lehtovaara (Ed.), Experiential learning in foreign language education (pp. 8-60). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
  17. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  18. Langfred, C. W. (2000). The paradox of self-management: individual and group autonomy in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 563-585.<563::aid-job31>;2-h
  19. Little, D. (2020). Language learner autonomy: Rethinking language teaching. Language Teaching, 55(1), 64–73.
    | |
  20. Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.
  21. Littlewood, W. (1997). Self-access: Why do we want it and what can it do? In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 79-91). Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
  22. Liu, Ming-Chi, Huang, Yueh-Min, Xu, Yo-Hsin (2018). Effects of individual versus group work on learner autonomy and emotion in digital storytelling. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 1009-1028.
    | |
  23. Myskow, G., Bennett, P. A., Yoshimura, H., Gruendel, K., Marutani, T., Hano, K., & Li, T. (2018). Fostering collaborative autonomy: The roles of cooperative and collaborative learning. Relay Journal, 1(2), 360-381.
  24. Nikolaeva, S., Zadorozhna, I., & Datskiv, O. (2019). Development of Pre-Service English Teachers’ Language Skills and Learner Autonomy via Blended Learning. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(2), 222-239.
  25. Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In Ph. Benson & P. Voller (Ed.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman.
  26. Octaberlina, L. R. & Muslimin, A. I. (2021). Online learning: students’ autonomy and attitudes. XLinguae, 14(1), 49-61.
  27. Palfreyman, D. M. (2018). Learner Autonomy and Groups. In A. Chik et al. (Eds.), Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching, (pp. 51–72). London: Palgrave. Macmillan.
  28. Pearson, C. A. L. (1992). Autonomous workgroups: An evaluation at an industrial site. Human Relations, 45, 905-936.
  29. Pekruhl, U. (1994). Three Dimensions of Group Work: Cooperation, Participation and Autonomy at German Workplaces. AI & Society, 8(3), 216-234.
  30. Ponton, M. K. (2020). Group Learning Through the Lens of Learner Autonomy. International Journal of Learning and Development, 10(2), 23.
  31. PSYCHOL-OK. Psycological Help (2022).
  32. Scharle, A., Szabo, A. (2005). Learner Autonomy: a guide to developing learner responsibility. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Stanojević Gocić, M., Jankovic, A. (2021). Investigating Learner Autonomy of EFL and ESP Students at the Tertiary Level: Cross-sectional Study. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(4), 601-610.
  34. Stolk, J., Martello, R., & Geddes, J. (2007). Work in progress – building autonomous students: Modeling curricular approaches for lifelong learning: 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Milwaukee, WI, 10-13 October.
  35. Synekop, O. (2018). Cognitive Aspect of Learning Style in Differentiated ESP Instruction for the Future IT-specialists. Advanced Education, 10, 40-47.
  36. Teng, M. F. (2019). Learner Autonomy: An Educational Goal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. In: Autonomy, Agency, and Identity in Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language (pp. 1-20). Springer, Singapore.
  37. Thomas, K. W., Tymon, W. G. (1993). Empowerment inventory. Tuxedo, NY: Xicom.
  38. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  39. Tuchina, N., Borysov, V., Podhurska, I., Kupina, I., & Borysenko, N. (2020). Developing Learner Autonomy via Choosing a Person’s Educational Pathway. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 209-225.
  40. Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Harlow, Essex: Longman Group Ltd.
  41. Van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. G., Seinen, B., Kompier, M. (2001). Autonomous teamwork and psychological well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 291-301.
  42. Vygotsky, L.S. (1935). The dynamics of the mental development of a student in connection with learning. The mental development of children in the learning process. (Dinamika umstvennogo razvitiya shkolnika v svyazi s obucheniem. Umstvennoe razvitie detej v proczesse obucheniya.) Moscow; Leningrad: GIZ.
  43. Wall, T. D. & Clegg, C. W. (1981). A longitudinal field study of group work redesign. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 2, 31-49.
  44. West, M. A., Sacramento, C. A. (2010). Team Reflexivity. In J. M. Levine, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 907-909). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  45. Winch, Ch. (2002). Strong Autonomy and Education. Educational Theory, 52(1), 27-41.
  46. Zadorozhna, IP (2012). Theoretical and methodological principles of organization of independent work of pre-service teachers to master English communicative competence (Teoretyko-metodychni zasady organizaciyi samostijnoyi roboty majbutnix uchyteliv z ovolodinnya anglomovnoyu komunikatyvnoyu kompetenciyeyu). (Dissertation for Pedagogical Sciences). Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv.
  47. Zankov, L. V. (1968). Didaktika i zhizn (Didactics and Life.). Moskva: Prosveshhenie.
  48. Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom, 2nd ed., Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.




How to Cite