CONSONANTAL ORGANIZATION IN ENGLISH POETIC DISCOURSE: TOPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
The aesthetic reflection of the world in language finds its expression in the oldest, phonetic aspect of the word’s meaning. Phonetic timbre is the distinctive quality in the sounds of words. A marked consistency of texture in poetic discourse is achieved by alliteration. There is a growing interest in its aesthetic measure. The aim of this article is to suggest, following G. Mazzola, a conceptual framework for consonantal analysis of poems in terms of the category of topological spaces. The topological space of the line is viewed as made of phonetic toposes. They include a consonant sound and its morphism. A consonant sound carries substance and is called “denotator”. The conceptual form of denotator consists of Name, Type, and Coordinator. The name of the consonant represents the phonetic theme: the n phonetic theme embraces high timbre consonants, while the m phonetic theme includes low timbre consonants. Two types of consonance are singled out – complete consonance and incomplete consonance. The results of the analysis of poetic discourse show that complete consonance coordination has two forms: simple morphism and compound morphism. In case of incomplete consonance the morphism is intensified or lax. Phonetic topology may prove to be an effective mechanism in the study of “orchestration of voice” in poetic discourse as a socio-cultural phenomenon.
Berke, K. (1964). On Musicality in Verse. In K. Berke, Perspectives by Incongruity (pp. 110-118). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Broadbent, J. (Ed.). (1974). Poets of the 17th Century (Vol. 1). New York, US: A Signet Classics.
Eilson, J.D. (Ed.). (1969). The Works of Shakespeare. The Sonnets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gittings, R. (Ed.). (1966). Selected Poems and Letters of John Keats. London, UK: Heinemann.
Lea, R.B., Rapp, D.N., Elfenbein, A., Mitchel, A.D. & Romine, R.S. (2008). Sweet silent thought: Alliteration and resonance in poetry comprehension. Psychological Science, 19, 7, 709-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02146.x
Lumsden, R. (Ed.). (2010).Identity Parade. New British & Irish PoetsHexham. UK: Bloodaxe Books Ltd.
Mazzola, G. (2002). The Topos of Music. Geometric Logic of Concepts, Theory, and Performance. Zurich, Switzerland: Springer Basel AG. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8141-8
McCurdy, N., Lein, J., Coles, K. & Meyer, M. (2015). Poemage: Visualizing the Sonic Topology of a Poem. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 22(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2015.2467811
Mihajlov, A.V. (2006). O krizise v naukah i kulture [On the crisis in sciences and culture]. In A.V. Mihajlov, Izbrannoe. Istoricheskaja pojetika i germenevtika (pp. 471-520). St. Petersburg, Russia: Izdatelstvo SPbGU.
Robson, E.M. (1959). The orchestra of the language. New York, US: Thomas Yoseloff. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060895
Udalov, V.L. (2011). Problema tochnosti literaturovedenija i drugih nauk [The problem of literary precision in criticism and other sciences]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu Ekonomiky ta Prava imeni Alfreda Nobelia. Seriia “Filolohichni nauky”, 1 (1), 23-31.
Ukrainets, L.R. (2015). Estetyka psykholohichno motyvovanykh fonetychnykh odynyts (na mteriali ukrainskoi poetychnoi movy XX – XXI st.) [Aesthetics of psychologically motivated phonetic units (on the material of Ukrainian poetry of the 20th-21st centuries)]. Odeskyi linhvistychnyi visnyk, 6, 2, 122-124.
Yngve, V.N. (2006). An outline of Hard-Science Phonetics-Phonology. In V.N. Yngve, Z. Wasik, Hard-Science Linguistics. New York, US: Continuum.
Zemskaja, E.A. & Kaljanchuk, M.L. (Eds.). (2007). Zhizn jazyka. Pamjati Mihaila Viktorovicha Panova [Life of language: To the memory of M.V. Panov].Moscow, Russia: Jazyki slavjanskoj kultury.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Natalia Neborsina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)