DEFINING, ASSESSING AND IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY IN THE USA

O. Yu. Chugai

Abstract


The article deals with effective strategies of assessing and improving teacher quality in the USA. At the beginning of the article definitions of teacher quality are provided. Thus, the characteristics of “highly qualified teacher” are: having a bachelor’s degree, being licensed by the state, demonstrating subject matter competence, while  the characteristics of “exemplary” teachers are: recognition of administration and colleagues, contribution to professional development of other teachers, developing curricula, creating learning environment which enhances students’ achievements. It is highlighted that there is a tendency fоr developing teachers’ standards based on students’ outcomes. Mentoring, continual professional development, observing and evaluating teaching performance are considered to be vital prerequisites of teacher quality. The article introduces detailed analysis of reasons for low status of teachers in the USA: the ones connected with normal schools evolvement into universities, with the position of teachers in society and the nature of teaching profession itself. The best strategies of assessing and improving teacher quality are identified: large-scale surveys, classroom observation, written examinations of teachers, student performance and achievement. It is stated that in order to meet the requirements of accountability, the emphasis is put on the continuous assessment which allows revision and improvement of academic university programs. University faculty members, internal and external experts are central in defining and assessing teacher quality. Much attention is paid to licensure as a prerequisite to teacher quality assurance, as well as to developing performance-based tests like Praxis III. Raising entry standards, reducing licensure differences between states, inclusion of clinical experience as a condition of program approval and teacher licensure are necessary for improving teacher quality in the USA. Prospects of further investigation are peculiarities of the Praxis assessment and its impact on teacher quality.


Keywords


teacher quality; assessment; licensure; observation tools; accountability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends R.I. (2004). Learning to teach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Darling-Hammond L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Labaree D. (2008). An Uneasy Relationship: The History of Teacher Education in the University. In D. Labaree, Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Issues in Changing Contexts (pp. 297-299). NY: Routledge, Co-published by the Association of Teacher Educators.

Levine A. (2006). Educating School Teachers. Washington: The Education Schools Project.

Observation of Teaching Checklist – Auburn University. Retrieved from: http://www.education.auburn.edu/files/program_resources/minors_certs_requestforms/teaching_observation.pdf

Richards J.C., Farrell T.S.C. (2011). Practice Teaching: A Reflective Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Strong M. (2011). The Highly Qualified Teacher: What Is Teacher Quality And How Do We Measure It? New York and London: Teachers College Press.

Teacher Quality: A Report on the Preparation and Qualifications of Public School Teachers. (1999). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Teacher Quality: The 2013 International Summit on the Teaching Profession. (2013). Retrieved from: http://asiasociety.org/files/teachingsummit2013.pdf

The Association of Teacher Educators. (2015). Retrieved from: http://www.ate1.org 11. Where we stand on teacher quality. An issue paper form ETS. (2004). Retrieved from: https://www.ets.org/Media/Education_Topics/pdf/teacherquality.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.51350

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 O. Chugai

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)