Marina Kizil, Elina Kushch


The focus of the article is Thematic Progression as a text and a genre forming phenomenon. Thematic Progression contributes to  the cohesive development of any text, the distribution of given and new information of which needs to follow certain patterns. Thematic progression patterns deal with the set of meaningful sense groups which constitute a coherent text. Basic thematic progression patterns are: simple linear thematic progression, thematic progression with a continuous (constant) Theme, thematic progression with derived Themes and thematic progression with a split Rheme. They are peculiar to many languages. However, texts of different genres and the same language exhibit different patterns of Thematic Progression. This indicates that Thematic Progression, its patterns and their varieties are genre specific. To prove this, the article dwells on the Theme progression patterns and peculiar features of their Theme-Rheme organisation in texts of literary and legislative genres. While linear-constant thematic progression patterning is typical of a literary text, a legislative text is mainly based on the constant-linear thematic progression pattern. Constant-linear thematic progression patterning in the legislative text contributes to its informativeness, argumentativeness, unambiguity, and detailed specification of the given information. In comparison with the legislative text, the literary text has a variety of thematic progression patterns made of linear thematic progression, derived thematic progression and elliptical progression types. Regular linear-constant thematic progression patterning employed in the literary text helps to unfold textual information successively that contributes to its coherence and more effective perception.


genre; legislative; literary; pattern; text; Thematic Progression; Theme-Rheme organisation

Full Text:



Abed, A. Q. (2015). Patterns of thematic progression in C. Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities. Journal of the Faculty of Arts, 92, 77-101.

Retrieved December 12, 2017, from

Abdol, K. Al., & Hamed, S. (2014). Information development in Arabic research articles abstract. International Journal of

English and Education, 3 (1), 42-49. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from

Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2008). Official Journal of the European Union, 51. Retrived September 1, 2018, from

Daneš, F. (1989). Functional sentence perspective and text connectedness. In M. E. Conte, J. Petöfi & E. Sözer. (Eds.), Text and

Discourse Connectedness: Proceedings of the Conference on Connexity and Coherence (pp. 23-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Daneš, F., (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F.Daneš (Ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective (pp. 106-128). Prague: Academia.

Drápela, M. (2015). The FSP bibliography. In Martin Drápela (Ed.), A Bibliography of Functional Sentence Perspective 1956-2011

(pp. 33-186). Brno: Masaryk University.

Dubois, B. L. (1987). A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text 7(2), 89-116.

Dušková, L. (2015). Czech approaches to information structure: theory and applications. In Martin Drápela (Ed.), A Bibliography of

Functional Sentence Perspective 1956-2011 (pp. 9-32). Brno: Masaryk University.

Enkvist, N. E. (1974). Theme dynamics and style: and experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 5, 127-135. Retrieved April 22, 2019, from

Fang, D., & Li, S. (2015). Thematic structure and its application to English Writing. In P. Shaw (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management (pp. 263-266). Hong Kong: Atlantis Press, Curran Associates Inc.

Fibras, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fitzelald, S. F. (1996). Tender is the night. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Ghadessy, M. (1995). Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English text (pp. 129-126). London: Pinter.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1995). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London & New York: Longman.

Maton, K., Martin, J. R., & Matrrugilio, E. (2016). LCT and systemic functional linguistics: Enacting complementary theories for explanatory power. In K. Maton, S. Hood & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory (pp. 3-78). London: Routledge.

Nwogu, K. & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses (pp. 369-384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rahmawati, R. V. & Kurniawan, E. (2015). Thematic progression analysis in Indonesian EFL students’ thesis abstracts. Indonesian EFL Journal, 1(1), 81-87.

Tan, J. H., & Sun, W. G. (2010). Enlightenment of progression patterns of theme and rheme in English teaching. Journal of

Xuzhou Normal University. Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 36(1), 140-143. Retrieved September 2, 2018, from

Copyright (c) 2019 Marina Kizil, Elina Kushch

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)