DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.127332

LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY OF METROPOLITAN ANTHONY OF SOUROZH (BLOOM)

Svitlana Shepitko, Mariia Smyrnova

Abstract


The paper focuses on the essential problem of linguistic personality analysis. It aims to study language means representing linguistic personality of Metropolitan Antony of Sourozh (Bloom). The authors analyse the linguistic personality at three levels: semantic, linguo-cognitive and motivational. The linguistic personality is characterised through the prism of linguistic consciousness and speech behaviour, i.e. from the perspective of linguistic conceptology and the theory of discourse. The research results show that the linguistic personality’s cornerstone is the concept "BELIEF" which is interpreted by various confessions differently. The metropolitan mainly uses questions which can occur in the quotes used during a sermon that transfers a listener to a format of a polilologue. The preacher most often addresses the tactics of conducting a dialogue and the tactics of "thought-reading". As a preacher, Metropolitan Anthony of Surozh is a representative of Orthodox Church as a social institute, whose picture of the world is also influenced by the national picture of the world which reflects religious, historical, cultural and political presuppositions ofEnglandas well as those of 20th centuryWestern Europe. The authors state that the linguistic personality of a preacher experiences transformations under the pressure of secular society reflected at the verbal and semantic levels and, depending on a sermon recipient’s type of personality – at the motivation level.


Keywords


religious discourse; English Orthodox sermon; linguistic personality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bugaeva, I. (2010). Jazik pravoslavnoy sfery: sovremennoye sostoyaniye, tendenzii rasvitiya [Language of Orthodox sphere: current status and development trends]. Moscow, Russia: Moscow State University.

Fesenko, O. (2013). Jazikovaya lichnost: k voprosu ob interpritatsii termina [Language personality: the question of interpretation of the term]. Omsk, Russia: OEU.

Firth, J. (1950). Personality and language in society. London, UK : Oxford University Press.

Heather, N. (2010). Religious Language and Critical Discourse Analysis: Ideology and Identity in Christian Discourse Today. Pieterlen, Switzerland : Peter Lang Pub Inc.

Humboldt, W. (1998). Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Paderborn, Germany: Schöningh.

Kancher, M. (2000). O treh aspektah opisaniya yazikovoy lichnosti [Three aspects of language personality discription]. Yekaterinburg, Russia.

Karasik, V. (2002). Jazikovoy krug: lichnost, koncepti, diskurs: monografia [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Russia: Peremena.

Karasik, V., & Gillespie, D. (2014). Discourse personality types. Tomsk, Russia.

Karaulov, Yu. (2010). Russkiy jazik i jazikovaya lichnost [Russian language and linguistic personality]. Moscow, Russia: Editorial URSS.

Lischer, R. (2011). A Theology of Preaching. Durham, UK: Labyrinth Press.

Lowry, E. (2014). Doing Time in the Pulpit: The Relationship Between Narrative and Preaching. Nashville, USA: Abingdon Press.

Maslova, V. (2001). Linguokultorologia [Linguoculturology]. Moscow, Russia: Academy.

Milovanova, M. (2012). Metody izucheniya yazikovoy lichnosti sovremennogo dialektonositelya [Methods of studying of modern dialect-bearer language personality]. Volgograd, Russia: VNU.

Neroznak, V. (1996). Lingvisticheskaya personoligia : k opredeleniyu statusa diszipliny [Linguistic personality: on defining the status of a discipline]. Moscow, Russia.

Rowe J., Ha E. (2008). Archetype-driven character dialogue generation for interactive narrative. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Salakhova, A. (2013). Konfessionalnaya yazikovaya lichnost: kommunikativnye strategii i takniti [Confessional language personality: communicative strategies and tactics]. Tambov, Russia: Gramota.

Sermons of metropolitan Anthony of Sourozh (n.d.). Retrieved March 29, 2018 from http://masarchive.org/Sites/Site/Texts-E-Sermons.html

Snitko, T. (1999). Predelnye ponyatuya v zapadnoy i vostochnoy ligviculturah [Limit concepts in Western and Eastern cultures]. Pyatigorsk, Russia: PNU.

Smyrnova, M. (2017). Pravoslavna propovid u religiynomu dyskursi u 20 st.: ligvopragmatychniy aspect : monografia [Orthodox Sermon in Religious Discourse of the 20th century: pragmatic aspect]. Mariupol, Ukraine: Mariupol State University.

Vinigradov, V. (1980). O jazike hudozhestvennoy prozi [Language of fiction prose]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.

Zelyanskaya, N. (2012). Reconstruktsia "koordinat bytiya" yazikovoy lichosty politika kak metod linguopersonalisticheskogo opisaniya [Reconstruction of "being coordinates" of a politician’s language personality as a method of linguo-personological description]. Chelyabinsk, Russia: ChNU.

Zvezdin, D. (2012). Pravoslavnaya propoved kak zanr zerkovno-religioznogo stilya sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazika [Orthodox sermon as a genre of church and religious style in modern Russian literary language]. Chelyabinsk, Russia: Chelyabinsk State University.




Copyright (c) 2019 Svitlana Shepitko, Mariia Smyrnova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)