The purpose of the article is to prove theoretically and check experimentally the effectiveness of explicit models for language learning strategies based on the instructions in the process of professionally oriented English communication. The hypothesis of the research implies that the level of professional English communicative competence will increase in the case of combining such models as “top-down” and “bottom-up” while professionally oriented English communication. The study employed the mixed research design method as quantitative (Likert’s scale, Bespalko’s learning coefficient, Fisher’s criterion) and qualitative (interpretation of questionnaire results) methods. The levels of explicit models using for language learning strategies are defined by the results of the conducted survey of 116 pre-service teachers of Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. One of the conditions of experimental learning is a sequence of stages in the process of applying two explicit models for language strategy learning instruction “top-down” and “bottom-up” in the process of pre-service teachers’ professionally oriented English communication. Findings. The results of the control test at the final step of the experiment have confirmed the effectiveness of two variants of explicit models for language strategy learning instruction in the process of professionally oriented English communication. The analysis of experimental training results has shown the formation of professionally oriented English communicative competence at the level B2, as well as a significant increase in the participants’ knowledge, skills and abilities of foreign language learning strategies. Implications for research and practice. Combining “top-down” and “bottom-up” explicit models for language learning strategy instruction contributes to more effective assimilation and expansion of the repertoire of learning and communicative strategies and improves professionally oriented English communicative competence of pre-school teachers at university level.

Author Biographies

Natalia Dmitrenko, Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi

Department of Methods of Foreign Languages Teaching, PhD, Associate Professor

Liudmyla Melnyk , Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University

Senior Instructor, Department of Methods of Foreign Languages Teaching


Alhaysony, M. (2017). Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: the effect of duration of English language study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0701.03

Alshammari, S. (2020). EFL vocabulary learning strategies used by Saudi Arabia university students. Advanced Education, 16, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.202436

Anderson, N. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bespalko, V. P. (1968). Opyt razrabotki i ispolzovaniya kriteriyev kachestva usvoyeniya znaniy [Experience in the development and use of criteria for the quality of knowledge assimilation]. Soviet Pedagogy, 4, 52-69.

Butler, D. L. (2002). Individualizing instruction in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_4

Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586733

Chamot, A. U. (2005). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA): An update. In P.A. Richard-Amato & M.A. Snow (Eds.), Academic success for English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers (pp.87-101). Longman.

Charoento, M. (2017). Individual learner differences and language learning strategies. Contemporary Education Researches Journal, 7, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v7i2.875

Cohen, A. (2006). Styles and Strategies-Based Instruction: A Teachers’ Guide. Centre for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.

Cohen, A. D. (2000). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.

Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume with new descriptors. Council of Europe Publishing.

Dawadi, S. (2017). Language learning strategies profiles of EFL learners in Nepal. European Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 2, 42-55. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578188.pdf

Dmitrenko, N. Ye. (2000). Avtonomne navchannia profesiino oriientovanoho anhlomovnoho spilkuvannia maibutnikh uchyteliv matematyky: monohrafіia [Autonomous training of professionally oriented English communication of prospective teachers of Mathematics: monograph]. Vinnytsia, Ukraine: TOV Tvory.

Dmitrenko, N., Nikolaeva, S., Melnyk, L., & Voloshyna, O. (2020). Autonomous ESP Learning of Prospective Teachers of Mathematics. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 86-104. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/201

Fisher, R. A. (2017). Statistical methods for research workers. Delhi: Kalpaz, New Delhi, India: distributed by Gyan Books Pvt. Ltd.

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625

Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. Routledge.

Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0346-251X(03)00048-4

Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.

Griffiths, C., & Incecay, G. (2016). New directions in language learning strategy research: engaging with the complexity of strategy use. In C. Gkonou, D. Tatzl, and S. Mercer (Eds.), New Directions in Language Learning Psychology (pp.25-38). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23491-5_3

Gu, P. Y. (2019). Approaches to Learning Strategy Instruction. In A. U. Chamot & V. Harris (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (pp.22–37). Multilingual Matters.

Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2018). The Effect of Language Learning Strategies on Proficiency, Attitudes and School Achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358

Habók, A., Kong, Y., Ragchaa, J., & Magyar, F. (2021). Cross-cultural differences in foreign language learning strategy preferences among Hungarian, Chinese and Mongolian University students. Heliyon, 7(3), e06505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06505

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. NY: Guilford Press.

Lai, Ying-Chun. (2013). Integrating vocabulary learning strategy instruction into EFL classrooms. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 10(1), 37-76. Retrieved 12 October 2019 from http://www.tjtesol.org/index.php/current-issue/69-vol-10-no-1/385-integrating-vocabulary-learning-strategy-instruction-into-efl-classrooms.html

Lee, K. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of learning strategies in learning English. Asian EFL Journal, 5(4), 1-36. Retrieved 15 November 2018 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/sept_03_ok.pdf

Macaro, E. (2001). Learner strategies in second and foreign language classrooms. London Continium.

Naeimi, M., & Foo, T. (2015). Vocabulary acquisition through direct and indirect learning strategies. English Language Teaching, 8 (10), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.5539%2Felt.v8n10p142

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House / Harper & Row.

Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies: Self-Regulation in Context. New York, NY: Routledge.

Oxford, R. L., & Leaver, B. L. (1996). A synthesis of strategy instruction for language learners. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.227-246). University of Hawaii Press.

Person, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: a review of research and a new conceptualization of learning. Elementary School Journal, 88(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1086/461530

Pfenninger, S., & Singleton, D. (2017). Beyond Age Effects in Instructional L2 Learning: Revisiting the Age Factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/PFENNI7623

Platsidou, M., & Kantaridou, Z. (2014). The role of attitudes and learning strategy use in predicting perceived competence in school-aged foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(3), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2014/5-3/43

Rahimi, M., Riazi, A., & Saif, S. (2008). An investigation into the factors affecting the use of language learning strategies by Persian EFL learners. CJAL, 11(2), 31-60. Retrieved 5 June 2019 from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/1991

Rao, Z. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: interpretations from information-processing theory. Language Learning Journal, 44, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.733886

Rubin, J., Chamot, A., Harris, V., & Anderson, N. (2007). Intervening in the use of strategies. In A.D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp.141-160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sarada, J. (2019). The use of ‘5a learning portfolio’, a technique of learning strategies based on self-directed learning and metacognition to enhance English learning skills of Thai engineering students. PSAKU International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(1), 35-47.

Shawer, S. F. (2016). Four language skills performance, academic achievement, and learning strategy use in preservice teacher training programs. TESOL Journal, 7, 262-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.202

Taghinezhad, A., Azizi, M., Shahmohammadi, S., Kashanifar, F., & Azadikhah, M. (2016). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect learning strategies on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3, 133-143. Retrieved 18 November 3018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293719534

Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-42. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.x

Thomson, R., & Mehring, J. (2016). Better vocabulary study strategies for long term learning. University Humanities Review, 20, 133-141. Retrieved 18 November 2018 from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper

Urlaub, P. (2012). Reading strategies and literature instruction: Teaching learners to generate questions to foster literary reading in the second language. System, 40, 296-304. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.002

Zare, P. (2012). Language learning strategies among EFL/ESL learners: A review of literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 162-169. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_5_March_2012/20.pdf




How to Cite

Dmitrenko, N., & Melnyk , L. . (2021). EXPLICIT MODELS FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE STRATEGY LEARNING OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL. Advanced Education, 8(18), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.228502