Oksana Synekop


The paper deals with the issue of cognitive aspect of learning style of information technology (IT) students that is urgent in organising differentiated instruction of English for Specific Purposes at universities. R. Oxford's Style Analysis Survey and R. Amthauer's testing of intelligence have been used for studying the cognitive aspect. As the specifics of IT field are focused on such actions of IT specialists as perception, processing and implementation of textual, symbolic, graphical information, presented in oral and written forms, the most valuable parameters for organising the learning process and work with information for the future IT specialist are sensory modality (auditory, visual and kinesthetic) and the way of processing information (analytic and synthetic). Testing the third-year IT students and the fourth-year IT students has confirmed the statement of R. Oxford that learning styles are not dichotomous. Also, testing has shown that among auditory, visual, kinesthetic and mixed modalities of IT students, the dominant sensory modalities are auditory and mixed. Mixed modalities are represented by four groups of students: learners with visual, auditory and kinesthetic modality; learners with visual and kinesthetic modality; learners with visual and auditory modality; learners with auditory and kinesthetic modality. Testing results of the third-year and the fourth-year IT students’ way of processing ideas in the learning process indicate the tendency of predominance of the synthetic way of processing information and also mixed synthetic and analytic ways of processing information in the IT students. According to the R. Amthauer's test of the verbal and nonverbal intelligence of IT students can be presented as the relation 3(spatial)˂1(mathematical)˂2(verbal). The theoretical and practical thinking of the third- and fourth-year IT students are relatively balanced. All the specifics of IT students should be taken into account in the differentiated instruction of English for specific purposes. The ways of using such specifics are presented in recommendations.



differentiated instruction; learning style; cognitive aspect; English for specific purposes; IT students

Full Text:



Barbe, W.B. & Milone, M.N. (1981). What we know about modality strengths. Educational Leadership, 38, 378-380. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from:

Barbe, W.B., Swassing, R.H. & Milone, M.N. (1979). Teaching through modality strengths: concepts and practices. Columbus: Zaner-Bloser.

Barbe, W.B., Swassing, R.H., & Milone, M.N. (1981). Teaching to modality strengths: Don’t give up yet! Academic Therapy, 16, 261-266.

Barbe, W.B., & Milone, M.N. (1982). Modality Characteristics of Gifted Children. G/C/T, 5(1), 2-5. https://doi:10.1177/107621758200500102

Bishop-Clark, C. (1995). Cognitive style, personality, and computer programming. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(2), 241-260.

Bondar, L. V. (2011). Metody`ka navchannya franczuz`kogo profesijno spryamovanogo monologichnogo movlennya studentiv texnichny`x special`nostej z uraxuvannyam yix navchal`ny`x sty`liv [Methodology of teaching French professional oriented monologue to students of technical specialties taking into account their educational styles]. Unpublished candidate dissertation, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Brooks, C.J., Anderson, A.J., Roach, N.W., McGraw, P.V., & McKendrick, A.M. (2015). Age-related changes in auditory and visual interactions in temporal rate perception. Journal of Vision, 15(2).

Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444.

Derkach, T. (2018). Preferred Learning Styles of Students Majoring in Chemistry, Pharmacy, Technology and Design. Advanced Education, 9, 55‒61.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Mahwah, New Jersey, London.

Dreyer, C. & Van der Walt, J.L. (1996). Learning and teaching styles: Empowering diverse learners in tertiary classrooms. Koers, 61(4), 469-482.

Dunn, R. (1984). Learning style: State of the science. Theory Into Practice, 23(1), 10-19.

Bakaieva, G.Ye. et al. (2005) English for Specific Purposes (ESP). National Curriculum for Universities. Kyiv, Ukraine: British Council.

Grasha, A.F. (1984). Learning styles: the journey from Greenwich Observatory (1796) to the college classroom (1984). Improving College and University Teaching, 32(1), 46–53.

Grossmann, D. (2011). A study of cognitive styles and strategy use by successful and unsuccessful adult learners in Switzerland. Master of Arts dissertation, the School of Humanities of the University of Birmingham.

Guild, P.B. (2001). Diversity, Learning Style and Culture. New Horizons for Learning. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from:

Kondrashihina, O.A. (2009). Differencial'naja psihologija [Differential Psychology]. Kiev, Ukraine: Centr uchebnoj literatury.

Leaver, B.L. (2000). Metodika individualizirovannogo obuchenija inostrannomu jazyku s uchetom vlijanija kognitivnyh stilej na process ego usvoenija [Methods of individualised learning a foreign language with taking into account the influence of cognitive styles on the process of its mastering]. Unpublished candidate dissertation, A. S. Pushkin State Institute of Russian Language, Moscow, Russia.

Mahadevan, L., Simon, J.C., & Meservy, O.T. (2011). Effects of Developer Cognitive Style and Motivations on Information Security Policy Compliance. AMCIS 2011 Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Detroit, Michigan. August 4th-7th 2011, 1‒8. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from:

Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83.

Myers, I.B., & McCaulley M.H. (1985). Manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Orel, E.A. (2007). Diagnostika osobennostej myslitel'noj dejatel'nosti specialistov v oblasti informacionnyh tehnologij (programmistov) [Diagnostics of the mental activity features of specialists in the field of information technology (programmers)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University named, Moscow, Russia.

Oxford, R.L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: an overview. Learning Styles & Strategies,1-25. Oxford, GALA. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from:

Oxford, R.L. (1992). Who Are Our Students? A Synthesis of Foreign and Second Language Research on Individual Differences with Implications for Instructional Practice. TESL Canada Journal, 9(2), 30-49.

Rebecca Oxford's Style Analysis Survey (SAS). Learning Styles Workshop of M. Walline (1996). Talpiot College. May. Retrieved October 19, 2018 from

Riding, R., Rayner, S. (1988). Cognitive styles and Learning Strategies. London. David Fulton Publishers.

Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher Educators’ Perceptions and Use of Differentiated Instruction Practices: An Exploratory Investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 309–327. doi:10.1080/01626620.2012.717032

Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291–301.

Tight, D.G. (2007). The Role of Perceptual Learning Style Preferences and Instructional Method in the Acquisition of L2 Spanish Vocabulary. Doctor of philosophy dissertation, the University of Minnesota.

Tarver, S. G., & Dawson, M. M. (1978). Modality Preference and the Teaching of Reading: A Review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(1), 17–29.

Tutushkina, M.K., Artem'eva, V.A., Volkov, S.A., Godlinik, O.B., & Gulina, M.A. (2001). Prakticheskaja psihologija [Practical psychology]. 4-e izd., pererab., dop. SPb. Izd-vo “Didaktika Pljus”.

Copyright (c) 2018 Oksana Stepanivna Synekop

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8286 (Online), ISSN 2409-3351 (Print)